question of the day: If it’s not Megan Fox as Catwoman, then who?
Newsflash: Megan Fox is the new Catwoman! Newsflash: No, she isn’t!
The idea of Fox as the new Catwoman might be no more than wishful fanboy thinking, though Hecklerspray offered the most bizarre — and anti-fanboyish — reason why it couldn’t possibly be Fox in the role:
Except, well, don’t get your hopes up. Megan Fox hasn’t officially been signed to play Catwoman in Batman 3, and that’s probably for the following reasons:
1 – If Megan Fox starred in Batman 3, then Catwoman would be 12 years younger than Batman. Therefore, the sexual relationship between Batman and Catwoman would be replaced by scenes where Batman takes Catwoman to play on the swings and washes her by spitting into a tissue and then rubbing it all over her face.
The leading lady would be 12 years younger than the leading man, though still of age herself… and this is a problem? Hecklerspray dudes, as far as Hollywood is concerned, this kind of age difference isn’t a bug, it’s a feature. (I’m guessing the Hecklerspray dudes were trying to be funny, but a joke like requires some sort of unexpected deviation from reality).
So: Would Megan Fox make an entertaining Catwoman? (Define “entertaining” however you like.) If not Fox, then who?
(If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me. Responses to this QOTD sent by email will be ignored; please post your responses here.)
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/flick/public_html/wptest/wp-content/themes/FlickFilosopher/loop-single.php on line 106