subscriber help

such a nasty woman | by maryann johanson

Syfy ruins ‘Being Human’

Here we go again. After the debacle that was the American deformation of Life on Mars, it’s happening again, with Being Human.

I’ve been hearing about the BBC’s Being Human for quite a while, and finally caught up with Season One [Amazon U.S.] [Amazon Canada] [Amazon U.K.] this weekend. (I’m two episodes into Season Two; Season Three begins in the U.K. on January 23, and I’ll be there to see it.) I love love love it. It’s smart, dark, passionate, engaging, brutal in places, funny in others. It’s a fairly realistic approach to the supernatural: If monsters really existed, this might be how they’d fit into the larger world — there’s nothing campy or winking here, though it is full of warmly human humor. I’m madly in love with the characters: Aidan Turner’s Mitchell, a conflicted vampire who’s trying to be good; Russell Tovey’s George, a werewolf who is terrified of hurting some innocent who wanders into his path during his “time of the month”; and Lenora Crichlow’s Annie, a ghost who mourns her lost life but keeps finding reasons not to move on to the next realm.

If the premise of the show — can three supernatural beings share a house without driving one another crazy? — sounds like a sitcom, that’s exactly what Syfy’s Americanized remake turns it into. Mitchell and George want to live lives that are as normal — as human — as possible, and Proper Being Human grants them that by making them fully rounded, complex characters: the U.K. version of the show is most certainly not a sitcom. Mitchell and George bicker with each other, sometimes, and with Annie, and they all tease one another, and they don’t always get along. But there’s never a sense that they don’t really care for one another. There’s always a sense that they’d do anything for one another… and they often do take enormous risks on behalf of their friends.

In Syfy’s pointless remake, however — seriously: just watch the British series — Aidan the vampire (Sam Witwer), Josh the werewolf (Sam Huntington), Sally the ghost (Meaghan Rath) can’t seem to stand one another. Their interactions have been reduced to childish sniping. In case you didn’t grasp the notion that they’re all trying to be human but must come to terms with the fact that they are monsters, they will constantly remind one another of these things. (I don’t think the word monsters is ever used in the U.K. show; it certainly isn’t a constant refrain.) The British original assumes you are not so stupid that you need to be reminded of the premise of the show every five minutes, that you will be able to discern what the characters want and what they are seeking from, you know, their words and their actions. The British show assumes you are capable of grasping subtext… and let’s be clear: the original Being Human, while wonderfully clever and deeply satisfying, is hardly abstruse or difficult to interpret.


What Proper Being Human does have is nuance and subtlety. All of that has been stripped out of Syfy’s Being Human. The ordinary house in Bristol the British monsters live in is now an Addams Family layer cake in Boston… because where else would monsters who want to be human live, except in a house that just about announces they’re weirdoes? The U.K. show opens with the three already sharing quarters and figures we’ll be able to pick up the backstory (it’s not at all complicated) — the U.S. one spells out every single little detail of everything that’s going on.

It’s infuriating. And enraging. And completely unnecessary.

Being Human debuts on Syfy tonight at 9pm Eastern. I do not recommend it.

edited to note: I previewed the first three episodes of the Syfy version

posted in:
tv buzz
  • TJ

    Usually when UK shows are remade in the US, the UK versions are better. I have to disagree when it comes to Being Human — I watched an episode of the US version and fell in love; I watched an episode of the UK version and I fell asleep half way through…it just couldn’t keep my attention. Sorry guys, but I am gonna have to take the US side on this one.

  • Thera Pitts

    They hardly ruined it, after four seasons it was a completely different show from the original, with its own merits. It is frustrating when shows are remade for the apparent purpose of capitalizing on a name, but I didn’t get that vibe from this show, to me they took a very good idea and did their own thing with it, it doesn’t ruin the original, just shows it from a different perspective. And it’s curious that you call it a sitcom, since I thought the original was more of a comedy with dramatic elements and the remake was more of a straight drama with comedic elements.

    As for the rapport between the four roommates, it may not have been as palpable at first since they decided to start at the beginning (not a flaw, from where I’m sitting, just a different narrative choice) but it developed beautifully, Aidan and Sally had an especially lovely dynamic. I miss the show terribly but the ending was perfect and bittersweet. I’m not going to suggest you give it another chance, if it’s not for you it’s not for you, but I personally think it deserves equal consideration.

  • Tonio Kruger

    I know my teachers said the same thing about my generation. Just as the Boomers criticized the Gen-Xers for similar faults and Gen-Xers are criticizing the Millennial generation for the same vices they were once accused of. There was a time when I would have found all that upsetting but today I’m more amused than anything else. After all, time tends to put such views in a perspective that is not always flattering to the people who once held them.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This