by maryann johanson, liberal movie person
Fri Oct 23 2015, 06:36pm | 6 comments
Look, weird as this may seem, if the story has actions that are totally physically and conceptually outside one’s personal experience, I get why someone might do this. Being out alone in the wild, injured, dealing with the complete dark that can exist at night — where every sound gets magnified, when you jump just as much at the sound of a mouse in the leaves as you would at the sight of a wolf in the daylight or the smell of a bear — maybe it was beyond his imagination and he knew it.
(I can’t believe I’m defending, however obliquely, DeCrapio.)
But, my biggest complaint with human-vs-nature movies is often how unrealistic the people’s actions are. Haven’t seen this one, but if it helped his deliver of the character, I’m for it.
Yeah, it seems like a reasonable thing to do if the role needs it; but similarly, DiCaprio is one of those actors who’s never worked for me.
DiCaprio is the only actor who works for me. He’s number one without question.
So I have to ask: what research do you think he did for the painting scene in Titanic?
So you endorse his extreme Method acting, then?
James Cameron actually draws the sketch in that scene!
based on the Aggregate theme by Elegant Themes | powered by WordPress