Collateral (review)Eat It Up I cannot express to you how much I love how Michael Mann's movies look and feel, but I love it so much I can practically taste it. It's an actual palpable thrill, my reaction to them. To call his work "stylish" is an understatement, but not in the sense that tacking a "very" or a "super" or an "ultra" before the word solves the problem. "Stylish" can be an insult. Mann's distinctive aura is unique -- there's no mistaking a Mann film for anyone else's. But it's more than that, too. Mann's movies thrill me because they make me -- cynical, blasé, jaded, seen- And Collateral is the most deliciously intoxicating Mann movie yet, slippery cool and brashly elegant, fresh and furious, like no one in the world had ever even conceived of making a movie about a hit man previously, let alone actually made one. Collateral feels like discovery. It's been instantly inducted into my personal pantheon of crime films, right up there with GoodFellas. I see myself becoming obsessed with deconstructing it. I can't wait to see it again. It's about, as you've heard, a hired killer, Vincent (Tom Cruise; go ahead and scoff -- I did), and the cab driver, Max (Jamie Foxx), he holds hostage on an all- Though there's much gunfire and zooming cars and foot chases and the like, Collateral is very much a thriller of the conscience -- it shares that with Mann's The Insider -- in which we begin to fear as much for Max's soul as for his person. Max is a decent man; Vincent finds it far more effective to threaten total strangers to ensure Max's cooperation, at one point, because Max is the kind of person who would not let an innocent (I use the word advisedly; you'll see) be hurt if he could stop it. But how long will Max tolerate that kind of moral coercion? And in Vincent, Collateral could be called a thriller of no- As I alluded above, I was skeptical, to say the least, at the prospect of Cruise (Minority Report, Mission: Impossible 2) as a steely- And for all that Cruise is a welcome surprise, Foxx (Breakin' All the Rules) is even more powerful a revelation. I'd felt like, when I was anticipating the film, that this would be the moment when we'd learn whether or not Foxx could actually act, not simply be goofy onscreen or make people laugh but make audiences care. And Foxx is -- I'm so happy to report, because it's great to see someone with previously underutilized talent get the chance to shine -- astonishing, making much of Max's small gestures and generous spirit, riding down the seeming contradictions of the character -- Max's simultaneous ambition and complacency, for instance, in his 12-year cabbie gig -- so that they're facets of a real personality rather than the simple inconsistencies of a pretend person they'd have been in the hands of a lesser actor. And I wish it was so commonplace that it didn't need to be noted, but it's refreshing to see a black actor in a color- All of that -- the suspense and the freshness and the Cruise and the Foxx -- are wrapped up with Mann's immensely satisfying piquancy. Kinda like how Collateral feels like the only crime movie ever made, it also feels like the first movie to be shot in Los Angeles. There's a smooth and smoky feeling to the city here -- it's like the jazz that predominates on the soundtrack -- hot and cool at the same time, the nighttime lights of L.A. glowing weirdly in the SoCal warmth and the early- |
posted:
Fri Aug 06 04, 12:53AM categories: reviews permalink infoMPAA: rated R for violence and language viewed at a semipublic screening with an audience of critics and ordinary moviegoers official site IMDB tip jarshare
relatedbloggyprevious post: Maria Full of Grace (review) next post: Absolutely Fabulous: The Complete Series 5 (review) |








