rated G? what am I doing wrong?This is hi-larious:
"No bad words were found," apparently. I'd say they weren't fuckin' lookin' hard enough. support
Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus |
posted:
Sat Jun 30 07, 4:14PM categories: maryann buzz permalink 10 pre-Disqus comments Disqus comments tip jarshare
relatedbloggyprevious post: film critic Joel Siegel has died next post: eight pointless things about me |
|
|
search
follow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)
|
||
follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online
|
||
share and enjoy
shop to support
support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:
• Amazon U.S.
• Amazon Canada
• Amazon U.K.
• Amazon Germany
• Amazon France
• Amazon Spain
• Amazon Italy
• Chapters/Indigo (Canada)
• Amazon U.S.
• Amazon Canada
• Amazon U.K.
• Amazon Germany
• Amazon France
• Amazon Spain
• Amazon Italy
• Chapters/Indigo (Canada)
pre-Disqus comments
posted by misterb (Sat Jun 30 07, 4:41PM)
When I put flickfilosopher through - I got R. But interestingly enough - not for the fucks but for using kill, suicide and other violent words (My own old blog was rated PG for the same reason) Perhaps this is an unAmerican site that objects to violence rather than profanity and sex.
posted by Josh Gilchrist (Sat Jun 30 07, 7:25PM)
Your blog for Knocked Up is rated
posted by Josh Gilchrist (Sat Jun 30 07, 7:26PM)
It was supposed to show the image there. Anyway, it is rated NC-17
posted by Shadowen (Sun Jul 01 07, 3:00AM)
Yeah, my problem with that site isn't the rating, but what they use to rate.
posted by MaryAnn (Sun Jul 01 07, 3:06PM)
If the rating changes seemingly on a whim like that, then what use is this rating system?
posted by JT (Sun Jul 01 07, 3:31PM)
They rate each page independently. If you enter the URL for the 'Knocked Up' review and the URL for the 'Ratatouille' review, for instance, you get different ratings.
The criteria for ratings is pretty stupid. CNN.com is rated PG for having the word 'gay' on the front page.
posted by Josh (Sun Jul 01 07, 5:18PM)
JT, that's not stupid. That's how the rating system works. People are afraid of anything to do with gayness, so the very mention of it increases the rating. My blog mentions sex once but was still given a G rating
posted by Josh (Sun Jul 01 07, 5:20PM)
Shit
posted by Tonio Kruger (Tue Jul 03 07, 7:16PM)
What the fuck! My blog is rated G as well.
Apparently those pendejos don't believe I use any pinche profanity on my site.
posted by MaryAnn (Tue Jul 03 07, 8:25PM)
Well, fuck 'em, then.