obsession boyfriend i'm psyched     i'm dreading enemy

(need an explanation?)

advertisements


why does the PG-13-rated ‘Beowulf’ have a redband trailer?

I started off pissed, and now I’m scared. Seriously.

Look: I’ve been kinda psyched for the upcoming Beowulf, opening November 16, because it’s cowritten by geek god Neil Gaiman and directed by Robert “Back to the Future” Zemeckis and because, well, it’s Beowulf, one of the greatest stories ever told and one of the wellsprings of modern epic fantasy.

And then I heard that this movie, which is slated for a PG-13 rating -- or so Gaiman and his cowriter Roger Avery said at ComicCon this summer -- has a redband, or “restricted” trailer, which means it contains R-rated material. (Trailers for all audiences, of course, are “greenband.”) Why would a PG-13 flick need a redband trailer? I’ll tell ya why: because Paramount, the studio releasing the film, is gonna try to squeeze as much dough out of us suckers as possible. They’ll get ya to put your butt in the seat for a regular multiplex showing -- as well as for IMAX and IMAX 3-D showings -- and then they’ll come at ya again with an unrated DVD release, which all the fanboys simply won’t be able to resist. I mean, look at how many versions of The Lord of the Rings trilogy we all bought on DVD. (Or so the thinking goes; this ain’t gonna be no Lord of the Rings.) And the fanboy suckers will fall for it, because rumor has it that -- hoo boy! -- one of the reasons for the harder rating will be full frontal female nudity supplied by Angelina Jolie, who’s playing the monster Grendel’s wacky, witchy mother. (I’m thinking it will be much like her insane performance as Alexander’s mother in that flick.)


more below the ad... scroll down...


This is all easily guessed, and why I was pissed, at yet another mendacious example of a studio messing us, its customers, around. I didn’t get scared until after I decided to torture myself by watching both the green- and redband trailers. The regular ol’ greenband trailer is available at Film.com: I was stunned to discover that the film is one of those CGI-enhanced motion-capture things -- somehow this had previously escaped my notice. This new Beowulf looks like a video game, all plastic “people” barely moving their shiny, fakey faces. How I had forgotten Zemeckis’s last adventure in motion-capture, the horrifying Polar Express, I can’t say, except that perhaps the trauma of it forced my brain to block the memory as a defensive measure.

As if that weren’t scary enough, to watch the redband trailer, you have to go to the film’s official site, and then to the “restricted” area of the site. To gain access to the restricted area, you have to supply your full name, zip code, and date of birth. And you can’t offer phony info, either (I tried), because the site checks up on you. They’re not kidding with the “Submit” button: it means “I authorize you to confirm the accuracy of the information I have submitted against government-issued ID.” Ho. Ly. Crap. Submit to your studio overlords right now: they know who you are, and they are using government databases to keep an eye on you.

How on Earth can they get away with that? And how on Earth can they expect that after giving them the right to rifle through your “government-issued ID,” we’ll be satisfied with an “exclusive uncensored Internet trailer” that offers nothing naughty beyond the greenband trailer except a brief glimpse of a possibly nude CGI-enhanced Barbie doll?

It’s time for a revolution. We gotta do something before it’s too late and we’re all at the mercy of Big Brother Global, Ltd., which won’t even keep us happy with decently sinful redband trailers.

(Technorati tags: , , , )


comments

Or, and I'm just sayin', a person could go to YouTube and type, oh, I dunno, say "Beowulf" in the search box, and then, whaddya know, the first video returned is the redband trailer. Just sayin'.

So kids could go through the whole official process and get denied, or they could just watch at the site they are using all the time anyway.

"One of the reasons for the harder rating will be full frontal nudity supplied by Angelina Jolie..."
--MaryAnn Johanson


Ahem. There's always "Gia." As if a lot of you straight guys didn't know that already.

FunWithHeadlines:

Yes, you're right. There *are* other places besides the official site to watch the restricted trailer. But my point still stands: Paramount Pictures is somehow checking site visitors against *government databases*!

Does that not terrify anyone else?

How do they even get access to that info? What the hell?

o.o

If you want to watch the trailer on YouTube, better hurry; the studio will be making sure the website pulls it. And with the new ID codes they're developing, soon people won't even be able to upload it anymore.

I remember when I saw Gaiman at a signing in October of 05, he mentioned the development of this movie, and how he and Avery fought to keep this movie out of Zemeckis’s hands, but ultimately realized that the two of them were just not "bankable" enough to make the film they really wanted to. They gritted their teeth and did the inevitable, probably ruining what could have been a great flick.

Why on earth should you have to identify yourself in that way, it's insane! I hope you didn't actually submit any information to them.

You can always use Dave's Trailer Page to get the trailer from the site directly, without navigating the website, which kind of defeats the purpose of the age validation!
http://davestrailerpage.co.uk/

I think the violence is the reason it's redband, not just the nudity. You raise an interesting point about the PG-13/R issue though, your theory seems credible, though I suppose perhaps the rating situation has changed since ComicCon?

Funny how you didn't know about the CG element of the film, I thought that was the main talking point! It does look fake and video game cutscene-like, but the word is it looks really impressive in the 3D format for which it is designed.

The violence in the redband trailer doesn't seem any worse than the violence in the greenband one.

post a comment

who I am


I'm MaryAnn Johanson: writer and ponderer in New York City who drinks too much wine and thinks way too much about such inconsequences as movies, TV, books, and the meaning of life.
[email me]

• contributor, Film.com
• member, Online Film Critics Society
• member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences
• visit my scratchpad blog, MaryAnnJohanson.com
• read my Doctor Who fan fiction

photo by David Speranza

(postings feed)

Add to Technorati Favorites

monthly archives

recent screenings and hot movies

just opened
yellow for maybe Diminished Capacity
yellow for maybe The Wackness
green for go Hancock
green for go Kit Kittredge: An American Girl
box office top 5
green for go Wall-E
green for go Wanted
yellow for maybe Get Smart
green for go Kung Fu Panda
green for go The Incredible Hulk
top limited releases
green for go Mongol
green for go The Visitor
When Did You Last See Your Father?
green for go Kit Kittredge: An American Girl
Then She Found Me
coming soon
green for go Man on Wire
yellow for maybe Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D
red for no Harold
yellow for maybe Hellboy II: The Golden Army
red for no Fly Me to the Moon
yellow for maybe A Thousand Years of Good Prayers
now playing
red for no The Love Guru
red for no The Happening
yellow for maybe You Don't Mess With the Zohan
green for go Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
green for go The Fall
green for go Young@Heart
yellow for maybe Quid Pro Quo
red for no Sex and the City: The Movie
red for no The Strangers
green for go Dreams With Sharp Teeth
green for go Iron Man
green for go The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian

2008 screening log

advertisements

search

Google
flickfilosopher.com
web
Powered by
Movable Type 3.36