obsession boyfriend i'm psyched girl crush i'm dreading enemy

(need an explanation?)

advertisements





when in Stratford-upon-Avon, U.K., I stay at
Adelphi Guest House




Rendition (review)

Simple Story, Hard Truths

Okay, maybe it’s a tad too Hollywoodized. Maybe the ending is a tad too upbeat, a tad too facile to be satisfying or even believable in a story based so closely on horrific reality. But maybe that’s okay for the moment. Maybe it will take blond pregnant Reese Witherspoon sobbing over her missing husband and handsome conflicted Jake Gyllenhaal getting his conscience pricked to wake people the hell up. Maybe just a little bit of pandering is exactly what we need right now.

(more below the ad... scroll down...)

Because this is actually happening, right now: people are being arrested on circumstantial evidence or none at all, denied access to lawyers, shipped to overseas secret prisons, detained indefinitely without charge, tortured. The lucky ones get released, eventually, and then get their furious lawsuits against the federal government dismissed by the courts. As for the unlucky ones... well, we don’t know yet. This fuckin’ Nazi shit is happening on American soil, to American citizens and legal residents, perpetrated by American law enforcement -- and it embarrasses me to have to repeat it for the small percentage of the American public that is informed enough to be aware of it, but it embarrasses me even more to know that for way too many Americans, their first exposure to this howling injustice will be Rendition.

But if that’s what it takes, I say we go for it.

Isabella Fields El-Ibrahimi (Witherspoon: Just Like Heaven, Walk the Line) can’t find her husband, Anwar (Omar Metwally), an immigrant from Egypt who has lived, legally, in the U.S. since he was a teenager. He seems to have disappeared without a trace while en route from South Africa, where he was attending a professional conference, to their home in Chicago. She’s distraught, of course, in a pretty, made-for-Lifetime female-empowerment-drama kind of way, but fortunately, she has a contact in the office of a U.S. senator, her old college friend Alan Smith (Peter Sarsgaard: Jarhead, Flightplan), so she pretty rapidly learns what has probably happened to her husband.

We’ve been witnessing it, of course: his snatching by federal agents as he changes planes in Washington, an “arrest” that can only be called a kidnapping; his fear at being accused of something he has not done (made bombs for terrorists) and the growing horror as he begins to realize how totally fucked he is as he gets caught up in the indiscriminate maw of the “War on Terror”: No lawyers for you, pal, the feds are delighted to inform him, and no call to the wife. Instead, he is flown off to North Africa, forcibly stripped of his clothes, and thrown into a coffinlike “cell” when he isn’t being tortured. That word -- torture -- gets tossed around in lots of metaphoric ways, but there’s nothing metaphoric about the sensory deprivation, simulated drowning, and electrocution he endures. These scenes are pretty graphic for a Hollywood film and they will leave you squirming, but every American should be forced to watch this movie, if only for these scenes, in order to see what is being done in our name, and in the name of, supposedly, freedom and justice.

It’s actually all a bit too easy to get outraged by all this: who wants to see a handsome man, a complete innocent, a loving father and husband like Anwar get abused? Sure, it’s a good defense against the idiots who know all about the end of civil liberties in America but dismiss it because, they’re deluded enough to think, “you don’t have to worry if you’re innocent” -- Anwar’s story, and many of the real-life tales that inspired it, prove that innocence is no protection. The much harder story, and perhaps one even more vitally necessary, is the one that explains why the guilty deserve their civil rights: but I suppose Rendition would have been an even tougher sell if Anwar looked like Osama Bin Laden and we witnessed him barbecuing and eating white babies and fluffy kittens.

Rendition is a baby step toward waking people up. I can live with that. I can live, too, with the too-easy story of CIA analyst Douglas Freeman (Gyllenhaal: Zodiac, Brokeback Mountain), who observes Anwar’s interrogation in the North African secret prison headed up by Abasi Fawal (Yigal Naor) and may be eventually coming around to decide this is bullshit.

I like much more how the screenplay and direction -- by, respectively, Hollywood first-timers Kelley Sane and Gavin Hood (Tsotsi, the first film from South Africa to win an Oscar) -- don’t fetishize the suicide bombing that sets the plot in motion, don’t ignore the truth (extraordinary rendition “started under Clinton,” one character says), and don’t overplay the villainy of even the villains, like Meryl Streep’s (Evening, The Devil Wears Prada) CIA honcho; with her clean white house and sleek white suits, she is evil at its most banal. I like how the subplot of Fawal’s teenage daughter (Zineb Oukach) and her unapproved-of boyfriend (Moa Khouas: Lila Says (Lila Dit Ca)) works in a sneaky, satisfying way to highlight the endless cycles of injustice and retribution that fuel so much of the violence we live with (much as The Kingdom does).

And I like that the most important issues raised are unstated: Do American ideals stop at our borders? Are the politics of compromise valid, and surely there are things about which there can be no compromise? If the “War on Terror” is, clearly, not about preserving and defending American freedom -- just the opposite -- what is it for, anyway? Isn’t every right our government strips from us -- strips from us illegally, even treasonously -- in the name of fighting terrorists just another victory for the terrorists?

If it takes a simplistic Hollywood movie to finally get the mainstream American public asking these questions for themselves, I’m all for it.

(Technorati tags: , , , , , )

viewed at a private screening with an audience of critics
rated R for torture/violence and language
official site | IMDB
(more below the ad... scroll down...)



comments

When you write: "every American should be forced to watch this movie", I wonder if you see the irony in making such an autocratic statement. Maybe those who resist being 'forced' can watch it while strapped to a water-board.

As a 21 year old Canadian raised on a steady diet of the just and good America standing up against bastards across the globe via hollywood movies for over a decade, it pains me that your country is doing this. America's moral high ground is lost and the world's only superpower is no longer trusted to stand up for human rights.

What astounds me even more is that there are millions of Americans who know of this but dismiss it 'cause you guys are fighting a war on a tactic. These Americans who berate the liberal left and hollywood for living in an idealized world and "hating America" strike me as the most unpatriotic as they are so willing to slice apart the very foundations that made your country so great.

I hope the universally loathed Bush administration will go down in history beside Nixon as one of the worst mistakes of American politics for his 7 years of slowly subverting (with apparent relish) everything your country once stood and was admired for.

Totally agree. Having just seen the movie, I agree with your assessment (or at least how I interpreted it): people should see this film, but it wasn't REALLY good. The reason your "See It", "Wait for DVD" and "Skip It" are refreshing is because they don't grade movies as art--that appears in the review. My impression is not that these categories of yours are tiers of quality, necessarily, but suggestions as to when and where a particular movie is worth our time (e.g. Simpsons was good, but you don't think seeing it in a theater would enhance the experience). Am I correct?

I like your rating system on this one as opposed to that of Ebert, whose reviews I respect quite a bit. I read his four-star review of this film this morning. His point was basically yours as well: people should see this film. But he didn't dwell on the craft of it or the strength of the story or the depth of the characters, as he usually does. Overlooking the flaws in the flick, he gave it a shining review (****) because he wanted to inject politics into his column and make sure people would see it; in the meantime, he compromised the integrity of the review. Meanwhile, you injected some politics (okay, a lot of politics) into your review while pointing out the movie's weak points without affecting your rating.

Who knows, though, since this all out of my ass and I can't read the guy's mind. But I've read too much of Ebert's stuff (wow, that's sad) to think he wasn't fazed by the tone-deaf middle hour. Keep doing your thing, though, because I find it more helpful when I'm trying to decide whether to take the trouble to go to the theater.

You might want to be a little more careful with the spoilers. One of the major reasons why I was interested in watching this movie was to see whether the Egyptian man was really a terrorist or not. The film could conceivably be a whole lot more interesting if he was. But given your mention of an upbeat ending and him being an innocent...it takes away from a lot of the tension I'm guess I would feel otherwise. Now the movie is much lower on my priority list to go to.

At this point, I guess you could say that those aren't spoilers but we're going to have to agree to disagree on that. Also, if you were being ironic while calling him an innocent and he turns out not to be - well done, I eat my words.

When you write: "every American should be forced to watch this movie", I wonder if you see the irony in making such an autocratic statement. Maybe those who resist being 'forced' can watch it while strapped to a water-board.

Yeah, there's no way that statement of mine could have been, oh, metaphoric. Or a deliberate exaggeration. Or poetic license. No way at all.

Regarding spoilers. I did think quite a bit about how much to give away in the review (and how much it might be interpreted that I'm giving away), and I came to the conclusion that the relative merits (and lack thereof) of the film were too important an aspect of that to avoid. I feel like I spoiled as little as possible in contrast to how the plot relates to the film's quality.

My impression is not that these categories of yours are tiers of quality, necessarily, but suggestions as to when and where a particular movie is worth our time (e.g. Simpsons was good, but you don't think seeing it in a theater would enhance the experience). Am I correct?

Yes.

Its interesting the way this is being marketed over here (the UK) - it's being portrayed as much more ambiguous on the rights and wrongs of rendition than your review indicates the film actually is.

Its worrying isn't it. Even when public opinion is about as vociferously against the War on Terror as its ever going to get the only films we get reflecting that fact have to have the sting pulled from them as much as possible. From what you say it doesn't seem like the argument against Rendition is that it is wrong, just that it means we occasionally get the wrong guys with it.

Its like the other argument used against torture I hear a lot - that the information we get from it is often inaccurate. I just really don't think the innocence of the people involved, or the accuracy of the information really has any moral bearing on whether torture is right or wrong.

Sorry, that was kind of ranty.

I don't think the film is AT ALL ambiguous on the subject of rendition: it seems to me that the film comes out on the side that it's always wrong.

I have just watched this film on DVD and I agree with Mary Ann: if you watch the film -- I mean actually watched it instead of listening to the marketing people or reading reviews -- there is absolutely nothing ambiguous about how it feels about torture.

Unfortunately, if it is marketed as an ambiguous take and that made people pass on it, then it means the "other side" is doing a very good job at spreading propaganda and ensuring that every tooth and nail is pulled out (sorry for the reference to a common torture method) of the dissenting public.

post a comment

who I am


I'm MaryAnn Johanson: writer and ponderer in New York City who drinks too much wine and thinks way too much about such inconsequences as movies, TV, books, and the meaning of life.
[email me]
[become a Facebook fan]
[visit my personal Facebook page]
[follow me on Twitter]
[friend me on MySpace]

FlickFilosopher.com is available on Kindle

• contributor, Film.com
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences
• visit my scratchpad blog, MaryAnnJohanson.com
• read my Doctor Who fan fiction

photo by David Speranza

(postings feed)


top critic on Movie Review Query Engine


as seen on Rotten Tomatoes


member, Online Film Critics Society


member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists

Add to Technorati Favorites

monthly archives

recent screenings and hot movies

just opened (U.S.)
red for no The Twilight Saga: New Moon
yellow for maybe Planet 51
not viewed by me The Blind Side [trailer]
not viewed by me Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans [trailer]
yellow for maybe Broken Embraces
green for go Red Cliff [trailer]
yellow for maybe The Missing Person [trailer]
green for go Precious (expanding)
green for go Fantastic Mr. Fox (expanding)
just opened (U.K.)
red for no The Twilight Saga: New Moon
green for go A Serious Man
green for go The Informant!
box office top 5 (U.S.)
yellow for maybe 2012
red for no A Christmas Carol
green for go Precious
green for go The Men Who Stare at Goats
yellow for maybe Michael Jackson's This Is It
top limited releases (U.S.)
green for go Precious
red for no The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day
green for go An Education
green for go A Serious Man
yellow for maybe Coco Before Chanel
box office top 5 (U.K.)
yellow for maybe 2012
red for no A Christmas Carol
not viewed by me Harry Brown
green for go Up
green for go The Men Who Stare at Goats
coming soon (U.S./U.K.)
red for no The Loss of a Teardrop Diamond
yellow for maybe Serious Moonlight [trailer]
yellow for maybe A Single Man [trailer]
green for go Everybody's Fine [trailer]
red for no The Strip
green for go The Private Lives of Pippa Lee [trailer]
green for go The Young Victoria [trailer]
green for go Creation [trailer]
green for go The Road [trailer]
green for go The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus [trailer]
other current flicks (U.S./U.K.)
green for go Amelia
red for no Antichrist [trailer]
red for no Astro Boy
yellow for maybe The Box
green for go The Boys Are Back
green for go Bright Star
green for go Capitalism: A Love Story [trailer]
yellow for maybe Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant
yellow for maybe Collapse
red for no Couples Retreat
green for go Creation [trailer]
green for go The Damned United
green for go An Education
green for go Five Minutes of Heaven
yellow for maybe The Fourth Kind
red for no Gentlemen Broncos [trailer]
green for go The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus [trailer]
green for go The Invention of Lying
red for no Jennifer's Body
green for go The Messenger [trailer]
green for go Ong Bak 2: The Beginning
yellow for maybe Paranormal Activity
red for no Pirate Radio (aka The Boat That Rocked)
yellow for maybe A Single Man [trailer]
yellow for maybe Where the Wild Things Are
red for no Whiteout
red for no Women in Trouble
green for go Zombieland

2009 screening log

new on dvd

11.17 (Region 1)
green for go Star Trek [buy]
green for go Humpday [buy]
green for go Bruno [buy]
green for go Is Anybody There? [buy]
yellow for maybe The Limits of Control [buy]
yellow for maybe My Sister's Keeper [buy]
yellow for maybe How to Be [buy]
green for go Farscape: The Complete Series [buy]
green for go Gone with the Wind: 70th Anniversary Ultimate Collector's Edition [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.S.)

11.16 (Region 2)
green for go Star Trek [buy]
green for go Moon [buy]
green for go Sunshine Cleaning [buy]
yellow for maybe Four Christmases [buy]
yellow for maybe Tyson [buy]
green for go An Evening with John Barrowman [buy]
green for go Doctor Who: The Key to Time [buy]
green for go South Park: Christmas Time in South Park [buy]
green for go Star Trek Trilogy [buy]
green for go Star Trek: The Next Generation Movie Collection [buy]
green for go Star Trek: Films 1-10 Remastered Special Edition [buy]
yellow for maybe Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles Season 2 [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.K.)

11.10 (Region 1)
green for go Up [buy]
red for no The Ugly Truth [buy]
green for go The Sarah Jane Adventures: The Complete Second Season [buy]
green for go Ink [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.S.)

11.09 (Region 2)
green for go Bruno [buy]
yellow for maybe The Age of Stupid [buy]
red for no Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian [buy]
green for go The Sarah Jane Adventures: The Complete Second Season [buy]
green for go All Creatures Great and Small: Christmas Specials [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.K.)

11.03 (Region 1)
green for go The Taking of Pelham 123 [buy]
green for go Thicker Than Water: The Vampire Diaries Part 1 [buy]
yellow for maybe Food, Inc. [buy]
red for no G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra [buy]
red for no Aliens in the Attic [buy]
red for no I Love You, Beth Cooper [buy]
green for go North by Northwest (50th Anniversary Edition) [buy]
green for go Doctor Who: The War Games [buy]
green for go Doctor Who: The Black Guardian Trilogy [buy]
green for go National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation (Ultimate Collector's Edition) [buy]
green for go Mission: Impossible: Complete Series [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.S.)

11.02 (Region 2)
green for go Public Enemies [buy]
yellow for maybe Last Chance Harvey [buy]
red for no Year One [buy]
red for no Blood: The Last Vampire [buy]
green for go Wallace and Gromit: The Complete Collection [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.K.)

my book (Amazon U.S.)

my book (Amazon U.K.)

advertisements

search

Google
flickfilosopher.com
web