Sleepwalking (review)

A well-meaning but hopelessly inept mother (Charlize Theron: Monster, who also produced the film) abandons her 11-year-old daughter (AnnaSophia Robb: Jumper) with her even more incapable brother (Nick Stahl: Sin City) while Mom goes off to do, well, we don’t know what. That kind of untidy loose end -- which is meant, I suspect, to represent the messiness of real life -- is part of what lends this visually impressive but naratively underpowered film its sense of not enough there being there. The performances are uniformly finely drawn: although Theron is barely onscreen for much of the film, the strange little triptych of a disfunctional family is instantly authentic, and Robb -- who is an astonishingly mature actor for age -- and Stahl develop an absorbing onscreen relationship both as their characters and as performers working against each other. But the story is lacking both a historical context -- we don’t know enough about the childhood of Stahl’s James to really appreciate the surprising act the film culminates in -- and a compelling reason for being told at all in the present moment. (The script is the second feature by Zac Stanford, who wrote the equally intriguing but equally deeply flawed The Chumscrubber a couple of years ago.) This is particularly a problem for a tale that’s meant to be about a dark past lighting a way -- or not -- to a dark future. First-time director William Maher, who’s mostly been a visual FX specialist prior to this, tries to make up for that with a muddy gray palette meant to infuse a grim emotional shabbiness, but all it leaves us with is a film that is ugly in a futile way instead of a consequential one.

support


pre-Disqus comments

You're too kind -- this is one of the worst films I've ever seen. How could you not mention Dennis Hopper's grotesque caricature of Stahl and Theron's Big Bad Father? Oh, their daddy didn't love them, this explains everything! Typical lazy psycho-pop screenwriting.

I wouldn't characterize it like that. It wasn't just that their father didn't love them, he was out and out physically and emotionally abusive, which of course can have a devastating effect on a person who grews up like that for his or her entire life. If that came across as lazy shorthand for explaining why these characters are the way they are, well, that's what I said the film is narratively underpowered.

Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Fri Mar 14 08, 10:20AM

categories:
reviews
> 2008 theatrical releases




2 pre-Disqus comments
Disqus comments

info


MPAA: rated R for language and a scene of violence

viewed at a private screening with an audience of critics

official site

IMDB



tip jar





share


 
 




related




bloggy


previous post:
Dr. Seuss’ Horton Hears a Who! (review)

next post:
daily list: 8 more things I hate about ‘Horton Hears a Who’

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)