watch it: “My Review on 10000 BC”
A critic serving an important demographic: 12-year-olds who wish they could base their moviegoing decisions on whether their "girlfriends" would like it or not...
(Technorati tags: My Review on 10000 BC)
more below the ad... scroll down...







comments
posted by Ryan H (March 15, 2008 7:44 PM)
I think this is kind of an interesting post. About a week ago you posted an FAQ on reposting your work without permission. I, like anyone else who is involved in arts and creative endeavors, gave a little knowing nod at how Of Course You Can't.
But then there is this. The waters are somewhat muddied by the fact that it was posted to a site that encourages embedding. On there other hand, there is no way to know if the YouTube poster is the original author. This might have been swiped from a personal blog or Facebook.
Did you obtain permission from this budding critic before using his content on your review site? If not, why not? I'm just curious what your thoughts are on this.
posted by ashok (March 15, 2008 11:41 PM)
Also, don't you think this is a little unnecessarily snide and meanspirited? I'm as depressed as anyone over the current state of movie-going culture but to hold up a 12 year old to ridicule? He IS 12...
I guess you could say you didnt intend to post it in a meanspirited context but it does sort of come across as such.
posted by Ryan H (March 16, 2008 12:32 AM)
I didn't actually read the post as mean spirited. A little tongue-in-cheek perhaps. Considering it is a twelve year old I applaud the effort he is putting in and think it is great.
posted by JT (March 16, 2008 2:12 PM)
So that's what Cletus Spuckler looked like as a kid...
posted by MaryAnn (March 16, 2008 2:14 PM)
I didn't mean to be mean: I meant to show how all sorts of people are using the Net to express themselves.
The video was posted to YouTube by its creator, and he did not disable the embedding feature -- I don't know how else to interpret that other than that he is okay with people embedding it on their sites. So I embedded it. On the other hand, there is a notice on my site that "No content appearing on this site may be reproduced, reposted, or reused in any manner without express written permission." I'm not sure that could be any clearer. either.
posted by joe (March 16, 2008 6:05 PM)
This is what Christian home schooling does to America's youth.
posted by Laura F (March 16, 2008 9:43 PM)
Um, where did you get the information that this boy was homeschooled and Christian? I looked and couldn't find it.
posted by Tonio Kruger (March 17, 2008 9:47 PM)
Laura F.,
The home school reference is obviously Joe's idea of a subtle joke.
I suppose I'd coin a similar quip were it not for:
1. The fact that most parents I know--including mine own--generally do some sort of home schooling before their kids start public school. (My father, for example, taught me how to read long before I started kindergarten.) They just choose not to call it home schooling.
2. The fact that parents who home school their children--even (gasp!) Christians--are hardly the worst social problem faced by American society. Of course I'm not crazy about the ones who choose not to teach their kids the theory of evolution. But having known cousins who were beat up in public school long before Columbine, I can't help but worry about more pressing issues.
posted by Laura F (March 19, 2008 9:08 AM)
Yes, my response was an equally subtle skewering, I suppose, since only I understood myself. Sorry.
I was homeschooled, and I'm a Christian, so I find those sort of broad generalizations (and the whiff of disgust and nose-looking-down that comes with them) personally offensive. That's just me, of course.
And it has very little to do with why I enjoy movies and why I come to this site.