the price of gas impacts celebrity newsOh noes! People magazine has to change its production schedule because the companies that drive the trucks that deliver the final printed magazines to stores and newsstands are cutting back on their schedules, in an effort to save gas. People magazine, under pressure from wholesalers, is moving its deadlines up by 12 hours to noon every Tuesday. What this will mean for us mere proles is obvious: we will have to continue to rely on the Internet for celebrity gossip. Because we all know that the Internet doesn’t need gas to run, because all us bloggers are sitting at home still in our pajamas at 3 in the afternoon, never having left the house at all since last weekend. Actually, I have been out today... to pick up the rental car I will drive down to Baltimore for Balticon on Friday. (Usually I just pick up the rental car on the day I’m leaving, but it turned out I would be into the weekly rate anyway for the duration of this rental, so I figured: Woo hoo! I can go to the supermarket and buy bulk toilet paper!) And the sticker shock when I filled up that rental near gave me a heart attack: $4.09 a gallon, $63.01 to fill up the tank -- which still had a quarter of a tank in it. And on top of that is the liberal embarrassment of being seen driving an SUV: all the rental place had left was a Jeep Liberty. It’s not an Escalade, which I would shoot myself rather than been seen in, but it’s not a Ford Fusion, either. So, you know, I’m feeling People magazine’s pain today... Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus |
posted:
Wed May 21 08, 3:49PM categories: talent buzz permalink 5 pre-Disqus comments Disqus comments tip jarshare
relatedbloggyprevious post: Steven Moffat to take over ‘Doctor Who’ from Russell Davies next post: The Fall (review) |









pre-Disqus comments
posted by Roger BW (Thu May 22 08, 5:38AM)
Cry me a river: http://www.aaroadwatch.ie/eupetrolprices/ (and it's gone up at least 10% since then in the UK).
Slightly more seriously: having some of the most expensive fuel in the world doesn't stop the UK's drivers from being very nearly as wasteful as Americans. Our governments have noticed this; something like 80% of the UK's petrol price is tax. Nice easy earner for them, and they can claim to be "green" at the same time.
posted by JT (Thu May 22 08, 10:07AM)
Roger BW: Don't give me the 'European gas prices are much higher, so don't complain' thing. The fact is that there are differences in costs of many things (food, health insurance, etc) between the US and the UK and when Americans say the price of gas is high, they are talking about how its high relative to their wages and high expenses for everything else.
There's a station with $3.83 a few miles from my house that has a line around the block. Pretty much everywhere else in Chicago is over $4
posted by MaryAnn (Thu May 22 08, 11:54AM)
Yes, gas prices are high in Europe. But much of those high prices are taxes that go to support mass transit and other things that are good for everyone. Gas is taxed relatively little in the U.S., so most of the high prices we're paying is going right into the pockets of the oil companies, who keep saying they have no control over the prices yet keep pocketing obscene record profits.
I love living in New York, where I can rely on mass transit... and do, most of the time.
posted by Roger BW (Mon May 26 08, 4:58AM)
Actually, most of our fuel tax is going into Iraq and Afghanistan, just like all the rest of the tax we pay. But I assume MaryAnn doesn't want a political rant here, so I'll stop there.
(I'm in London, so I have not only a reasonably usable public transport system but things close enough to be bicycled too - I'd rather go ten miles on a bike than on a bus or train any day.)
posted by MaryAnn (Mon May 26 08, 10:42AM)
Well, that sucks.