trailer break: ‘CJ7’Take a break from work: watch a movie trailer... It’s one of those boy-and-his-alien movies, Asian style. Cute. CJ7 is like E.T. meets Stitch, and the Three Stooges are looking after him, except all three of them are embodied in Stephen Chow. (The little boy is darn adorable and funny, too.) And if the new DVD trailer is an accurate representation of the home version of the movie, then it has been dubbed into English, so everyone can discover just how weirdly goofy this is. Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus |
posted:
Mon Aug 11 08, 2:42PM categories: dvd buzz permalink 11 pre-Disqus comments Disqus comments tip jarshare
read morerelated· Return (trailer) · The Amazing Spider-Man (trailer) · 7500 (trailer) · The Dictator (trailer) · Project X (retro trailer) · The Hunger Games (the final? trailer) · American Reunion (aka American Pie Reunion) (trailer) · Tim & Eric’s Billion Dollar Movie (trailer) · The Secret World of Arrietty (trailer) · This Means War (trailer) bloggyprevious post: watch it: “100 Movies, 100 Quotes, 100 Numbers” next post: my week at the movies: ‘Star Wars: The Clone Wars,’ ‘Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer,’ ‘Hounddog,’ ‘Henry Poole Is Here,’ ‘Sukiyaki Western Django’ |









pre-Disqus comments
posted by S (Mon Aug 11 08, 4:11PM)
I love Stephen Chow movies, but what's up with the awful dub?
posted by Danielle (Mon Aug 11 08, 5:17PM)
I read that the little boy in this movie is played by a little girl.
posted by MaryAnn (Mon Aug 11 08, 7:28PM)
What? Really? I'd like to see a link backing that up.
posted by The Big Movie Freak (Mon Aug 11 08, 9:21PM)
Head to CJ7's Trivia section on IMDb.com, or Ms Xu Jiao's bio on Wikipedia.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0940709/trivia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xu_Jiao
posted by MaryAnn (Tue Aug 12 08, 10:50AM)
Well, that's just weird. There's no reason the character couldn't have been a girl -- why bother with the sex change?
posted by MaSch (Tue Aug 12 08, 11:30AM)
ou clearly know the answer to your last question:
"Come on, now. Everyone knows nobody cares about what little girls do! Of course they had to change the character to a boy, a person of the only gender really worth telling stories about."
posted by amanohyo (Tue Aug 12 08, 11:44AM)
In traditional asian cultures, young boys are the goal and pride of every family, to be spoiled and coddled and bragged about and held up for all the world to see. Young girls are comparatively less important and more easily taken for granted, ignored and overlooked (unless there's something about them to criticize) until they reach the age of sexual objectification.
Most people know about this bias, but it's hard to understand how pervasive it is unless you have lived through it or have close regular contact with the sons and daughters in several asian families (of course, as with any generalization, there are exceptions).
So anyway... I'm guessing that this was a marketing decision that will be disguised as an artistic one (She did the best at the audition, but we didn't want to rewrite the script! The story just made more sense with a boy... etc.). It's certainly bad in Hollywood too, but aside from Studio Ghibli, the gender inequity situation is even more extreme in mainstream asian cinema. It's so ingrained that the idea of changing the gender of the child in the script might not have even crossed anyone's mind.
posted by MaryAnn (Tue Aug 12 08, 6:11PM)
But that actually would work *perfectly* for the story as it's told! The little boy *is* overlooked and ignored! But perhaps the Chinese would not see that as poignant if it were a little girl being ignored... since that's just the way things are supposed to be.
posted by amanohyo (Tue Aug 12 08, 6:26PM)
Exactly, the response if it was a girl would be... "Why is this movie making such a big deal out of nothing?" That means there actually is an artistic justification for keeping the character male. My bad. Just looking for an excuse to denounce sexism I guess.
posted by amanohyo (Tue Aug 12 08, 6:40PM)
On second thought, there's a fine line between marketing and artistic vision here. The makers know that the movie will be more emotionally gripping if it takes advantage of known sexist attitudes in the target audience, which will result in more tickets sold. Is that really an artistic decision? Probably a false dichotomy.
posted by MaryAnn (Tue Aug 12 08, 11:22PM)
Sexism! Now with more artistic vision!