Four Christmases (review)
Brad (Vince Vaughn: Fred Claus) and Kate (Reese Witherspoon: Rendition) are perfectly, deliriously happy with their unmarried, child-free existence, so naturally this cannot be allowed to stand. Over the course of a single Christmas day of visits with her mother, his father, his mother, and her father (and their assorted new partners, and their siblings, and their siblings-in-law, and so on), they will gradually come around to acknowledging the error of their nonconformist ways. It’s not all a total loss, even for those of us more likely to identify with Brad and Kate at the beginning of the film than we are once they’ve been “fixed”: if you like the two stars (I do), you’ll love them here, and while a bit more of the humiliation brand of physical comedy is deployed than a supposedly grownup movie should be attempting, much of it actually does work to generate sympathy on our part for Brad and Kate, rather than disdain. Still, the inevitable eventual swing to sentimentality -- and to teaching Brad and Kate a lesson in what everyone is supposed to want out of life -- feels like an abandonment of the movie’s earlier courage of its convictions. Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus |
posted:
Wed Nov 26 08, 11:23AM categories: reviews > 2008 theatrical releases reviews > Christmas flicks permalink 4 pre-Disqus comments Disqus comments infoMPAA: rated PG-13 for some sexual humor and language viewed at a private screening with an audience of critics official site IMDB dvdAmazon U.S. Amazon U.K. tip jarshare
read moreChristmas/holiday comedy grossout related· U.K. box office: ‘Four Christmases’ whips Bond’s butt (but ‘Madagascar 2’ whips them all) · North American box office: ‘Four Christmases’ kicks off the holiday season · 5 reasons I’d like to be psyched for ‘Four Christmases’ · question of the day: Was Universal right to cut the gay joke from its trailer for ‘The Dilemma’? · October 9: DVD alternatives to this weekend’s multiplex offerings · Couples Retreat (review) · dream cast: hypothetical ‘Buckaroo Banzai’ sequel · Thumbsucker (review) · Starsky & Hutch (review) · Water for Elephants (review) bloggyprevious post: Australia (review) next post: watch it: “Thank You Sarah Palin - Thanksgiving Version” |









pre-Disqus comments
posted by RogerBW (Fri Nov 28 08, 4:49AM)
I had been trying to work out why this film rubbed me wrong (quite apart from the "comedy" elements), and you've fingered it in your opening sentence. Thank you.
posted by Tonio Kruger (Mon Dec 15 08, 9:45PM)
Ironically, the one thing that turned me off most about this movie is that trailer seemed so anti-family. I realize that not all families are perfect and after the year I'd had, I should theoretically be sympathetic to a movie that makes that point in a compelling manner. However, this isn't that movie.
Anyway, I don't expect every character in a holiday movie to be likeable but it would be nice if they were interesting. And none of the characters in that trailer seemed like anything but refugees from a bad FOX sitcom.
posted by MaryAnn (Tue Dec 16 08, 10:54AM)
The thing about this movie being anti-family is that it was clear why Brad and Kate wouldn't want anything to do with their families: they're awful. If anyone had earned their aversion to traditional family life, it's them. And still, that cannot be allowed, which is ridiculous. Some people's families really are not very nice, and it's absurd to suggest that *everyone* must tolerate their families *no matter what* merely because they're family. But that's what this movie does.
posted by Jason (Tue Dec 16 08, 12:33PM)
I can say from personal experience that you do not have to like your family or at least certain members. My mother tends to make holidays horrible due to being a control freak. She moved to another state this year, and as a result non of my siblings, myself, or my wife wanted anything to do with holidays this year. And it has been great. Sometimes family is the worst people to be around. My inlaws, however, are great. Imagine that.....