Hotel for Dogs (review)

I do confess I was afeared of the potential for a funny-hat montage: it’s the kind of thing you expect from kids’ movie that features just about every kind of cute, ugly, cute-ugly, and funny-looking dog imaginable. But there was none of that here. There was, I concede, a bit with dogs on treadmills, but that is always hilarious, as well as the inevitable three-legged dog to tug at your heartstrings, just in case you’d been skipped over in the heartstring-tugging queue. Yes, this charmingly silly, sincerely sweet movie -- based on a young adult novel by Lois Duncan [Amazon U.S.] [Amazon U.K.] -- isn’t going to appeal much beyond the grade-school set, but parents won’t be too terribly bored; in fact, it feels much more like the classic, gentle family films of the 1970s we grew up with than the slapstick grossouts that pass for kids’ films today. Plus, there’s this: This is the story of a teenage girl (Emma Roberts: Nancy Drew) who is the hero of a story that has nothing to do with being a princess, finding or keeping a boyfriend, or, indeed, doing anything at the instigation or direction of a male. Her little brother (Jake T. Austin: Everyone’s Hero) does help her set up a jury-rigged shelter for street animals in a rundown hotel -- the gadgets he invents to help with the dogs’ care are clever and funny -- but she is the boss. She’s a far better role model than tweens typically get at the movies these days. (Oh, and really, folks: please spay and neuter your dogs, adopt from shelters instead of paying puppy mills, and support no-kill shelters, mmkay?)

support


pre-Disqus comments

ahhhhh, it so cute, do they kick a bunch of homeless people in the face on their way to saving all these animals.

OK, now I'm seriously considering changing my handle. :p

I was considering seeing this, I'm a sucker for happy dog movies, but perhaps I will wait for the DVD. Can't be that far off.

@ first John: lol, WHAT?!
Are you inplying that people who want to help animals do so by spitting on humans? That's an illogical conclusion to make.
But even if it WERE true:
Look, I sympathize with anyone who has to sleep out in the cold, but here's how I see it: humans have a lot more power over their destinies than animals. Even the most unfortunate human has more power than your typical animal. Animals don't have the mental wherewithall to provide for themselves without us (I'm talking about domesticated animals here, wild ones do just fine. But anyone who think an animal bred for domesticity can hold his own out there is sadly mistaken.)

No, I was just pointing out how people find animals without homes all cute and heartwarming. Then on the other hand homeless people are an unpleasant idea we'd rather not think about.

John may not be wrong, but you couldn't make a cute movie about homeless people. It would be condescending.

I'm also not sure that I understand the attitude that says, "Of all the problems in the world, X is way worse than Y, so it's wrong to try to do anything at all about Y as long as X isn't solved."

There's absolutely nothing about this movie that suggests that helping abandoned animals precludes also helping people. What it does do, however, is tell kids a sweet story about how the world is more than just their own little sphere of needs and wants, that they might think about looking beyond their own lives -- even though their own lives may be less than ideal -- and help others less fortunate than them. In this story, those others happen to be dogs. But they could also easily be other people.

Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Fri Jan 16 09, 5:43PM

categories:
reviews
> 2009 theatrical releases




6 pre-Disqus comments
Disqus comments

info


MPAA: rated PG for brief mild thematic elements, language and some crude humor

viewed at a semipublic screening with an audience of critics and ordinary moviegoers

official site

IMDB


more reviews at MRQE

dvd


Amazon U.S.

Amazon U.K.


tip jar





share


 
 


read more


based on a book
comedy
family/kids
girls/women


related


· The Art of Getting By (review)
· Scream 4 (review)
· cinematic roots of: ‘It’s Kind of a Funny Story’
· It’s Kind of a Funny Story (review)
· question of the day: What are some good movies (and TV and books) with young girls as heroes?
· March 19: DVD alternatives to this weekend’s multiplex offerings
· new DVD releases in Region 2, July 13
· U.K. box office: ‘Bolt’ electrifies British moviegoers
· movie posters in London (part 1)
· North American box office: ‘Taken’ takes the Super Bowl weekend top spot


bloggy


previous post:
screencap Friday: what the flick? #54

next post:
my new column: “The Week in Women”

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)