question of the day: What do filmmakers owe the fans of favorite universes?
J.J. Abrams is telling diehard Trekkies to avoid his new Star Trek reboot: “Don’t see the movie,” he has said. “You’ll just get angry. It is not Shatner playing Kirk, so I do apologize.” (I think he’s wrong about how serious fans will react, but I’ll get to that in my review, which I’ll post in a little while.)
Meanwhile, at Empire Online, Helen O’Hara explains why the studios should not listen to fans when it comes to beloved franchises. It’s because Fox did heed fan wishes, she says, and tossed Gambit and Deadpool into the mix of Wolverine that those same fans are unhappy with their treatment now: because those characters were shoehorned into a story in which they didn’t really belong.
So, my question today is: What do filmmakers owe the fans of favorite universes? Does it make more sense for filmmakers to do what is right, creatively, for a movie, even if it doesn’t satisfy the cravings of fans, or should filmmakers give the fans what they want, even if it doesn’t quite make sense within the context of the story they’re telling? Or is there a third option?
(If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me.)
Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus
Thu May 07 09, 10:43AM
join the conversation:
18 pre-Disqus comments
talk amongst yourselves
by MaryAnn Johanson
· question of the day: What movies are you most looking forward to in 2009?
· trailer break: ‘Star Trek’
· what the hell is ‘Fringe,’ anyway?
· question of the day: What will the legacy be of anime director Satoshi Kon?
· omg: Lucas Lee vs. the world, in poster form
· trailer break: ‘Creation’
· everybody loves Spock
· watch it: ‘Doctor Who’ PBS pledge break from 1987
· watch it: “An Awful Lot of Running (Chameleon Circuit)”
· watch it: “Michael Jackson Has Died”
watch it: “Keys Stab Kids Brain”
trailer break: ‘Land of the Lost’