everybody loves Spock
It’s easy to see why:
It’s one thing when everyone’s fallen so madly in love with Zachary Quinto’s Spock in the new Star Trek flick that Entertainment Weekly writers are blogging about their sexual fantasies about the actor and/or the character. (I will never, ever feel guilty again for swooning over an actor in these virtual pages.)
But if it means we have to suffer Maureen Dowd’s extended -- and painfully tortured -- metaphor about Obama as Spock, I’d prefer that J.J. Abrams kept his future Star Trek fantasies to himself. Dowd journalmalisms:
I dreamed that Spock saved our planet, The Daily Planet of journalism.
She got paid to write this. Paid a lot. The stupid, it burns!
Oh, wait, there’s more. Dowd’s piece inspired the Times to do this:
kinda sorta as a joke, but kinda sorta not, either.
Or else the Times is trying to be “hip” and “cool” and “geek,” which it should not ever, ever attempt again. Ever. Unless J.J. Abrams becomes editor-in-chief.
But even people who supposedly get Spock don’t get it. Owen Gleiberman at EW:
For the fans who’ve spent decades lining up at Star Trek conventions in rubber elf ears, Spock has always been, in his way, kind of cool. He’s a hero to anyone who experiences his own nature as intensely, if not overly, rational. But the whole premise of the series is that Capt. James T. Kirk is inescapably cooler. Spock is the mind to Kirk’s body, the control freak to his hothead, the rock to his roll. And so it has been for 43 years.
Making fun of fans who dress up? Check. Assuming that hard-core Trekkies must be uber-rational and unemotional? Check. *sigh*
But only a straight man who may have been a watcher of Trek as a kid but has no clue about the 40 years of Trek fandom that precede the new movie could say that “the whole premise of the series is that Capt. James T. Kirk is inescapably cooler” or that “Quinto invests Spock with a new layer of chilly-smoldering sex appeal.” (I’m making assumptions about Gleiberman gleaned from his writing and my at-a-distance, never-spoken-to-him not-quite-encounters at NYC critics’ screenings. I just don’t think he’s cool enough to be gay. Sorry, Owen.) I mean, yeah, Quinto is smokin’ hot as Spock, and I would not wish to diminish his performance in the role one nano-iota, because he really does bring a new depth of conflict to the character. And Quinto has certainly made me fall madly in love with Spock all over again.
But the fans who nurtured fandom from the earliest days in the late 60s through the first conventions and first fanzines in the 70s through the campaign to get the first space shuttle named Enterprise, through keeping the pressure on Paramount to bring the franchise back to the big screen and then the little one? Those fans -- the leadership of that organized fandom -- were women. And they were women who were drawn to Trek because of Spock. I’m making generalizations here, of course, but if there was a primary driving force behind Trek fandom, it was women who fancied themselves just the right women to break Spock’s cool. We female fans always knew that Spock not only had emotions but that they ran deep. We female fans always knew that Kirk was low on the list of fuckable officers on the Enterprise.
Bones was second for a lot of us. Scotty was third for me. I would have laughed at Kirk. (Maybe not Chris Pine’s Kirk, though... but he still would be way down on the list, certainly after Karl Urban and Simon Pegg.)
I include myself in that “we” of female fans not because I was among that leadership of fandom -- I wasn’t; the show left the air in primetime two weeks after I was born -- but because that was how I approached the show when I finally discovered it in after-school and late-night reruns. Spock, I knew, even as a young, inexperienced teenager, was hot. And dangerous. And the reason I kept watching. Well, the reason that was about teenage hormones and not about feeding my lonely nerd brain. Spock was... a challenge. A challenge to a woman -- or girl -- who appreciates male brains but not male sexual indiscrimination (I’m looking at you, Kirk).
And if there’s something particularly genius -- and particularly geeky -- about Abrams’ Star Trek, it’s that it acknowledges Spock’s sex appeal for smart women not as subtext but as overt text. I’ve said that Torchwood is pre-slashed for our amusement, what with everybody having sex with everybody regardless of gender or species. Abrams’ Trek is pre-fanfic’ed, what with it giving us a Spock who’s obviously drawn to genius women (thank you, Abrams, for making Uhura so damn smart) and willing to let one of them break his cool.
If the rest of the world is just catching on to Spock’s allure, that’s great. But they can’t pretend that it’s anything new.
Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus
Wed May 13 09, 10:43PM
join the conversation:
9 pre-Disqus comments
by MaryAnn Johanson
New York Times
· trailer break: ‘Star Trek’
· what the hell is ‘Fringe,’ anyway?
· question of the day: What movies are you most looking forward to in 2009?
· Star Trek (review)
· question of the day: Is it really such a bad thing if an actor plays the same character -- or his/herself -- over and over again?
· fair warning: ‘Expendables’ sequel all but inevitable
· calling bullshit on: Owen Gleiberman at EW’s The Movie Critics...
· question of the day: What do filmmakers owe the fans of favorite universes?
· question of the day: Is product placement in movies and TV necessarily a bad thing?
· Dredd (review)
trailer break: ‘Moon’
who will film my life?