the oh-no! DVD of the week: ‘The Pink Panther 2’ (blu-ray)I can almost just about understand why The Pink Panther 2 would warrant a DVD release. Folks will pick it up accidentally at Wal-mart because they’ll think its the first one (not that that one didn’t suck) and then be too lazy to return it (or will have removed the shrinkwrap, and then tough luck, sucker, it’s yours forever), or they’ll have heard that it’s only 13 percent Fresh on Rotten Tomatoes and that’s why they skipped it at the multiplex, but hey, maybe it’s worth a rental. But who in their right mind would shell out an extra 10 bucks -- on top of the 20 bucks you’d spend for it on DVD -- for blu-ray? Who needs to see Steve Martin’s disgrace in high-definition? Is his downfall really so important that it must be witnessed in the best possible picture quality human technology has been able to create to date? Should we not allow Martin his dignity, and at least give him the relative cover of 780p? Shame on us all. Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus |
posted:
Tue Jun 23 09, 12:39PM categories: dvd buzz permalink 4 pre-Disqus comments Disqus comments dvdAmazon U.S. Amazon U.K. tip jarshare
read morerelated· question of the day: What do you think about the Razzie nominations? · trailer break: ‘The Pink Panther 2’ · question of the day: Why hasn’t blu-ray caught on? · looks like I picked the wrong week to say that I’ll never buy a blu-ray player... · question of the day: Would you even notice if Blockbuster went out of business? · question of the day: What’s up with Netflix charging more for blu-ray rentals? · question of the day: Do you have a blu-ray player? · The Karate Kid (review) · North American box office: ‘Friday the 13th’ slays · North American box office: audiences into ‘He’s Just Not That Into You’ bloggyprevious post: do Iranians know who Doctor Who is? next post: trailer break: ‘Cold Souls’ |










pre-Disqus comments
posted by Dan (Tue Jun 23 09, 5:41PM)
Hey, it's "A Comic Gem" (according to that writing on the cover).
posted by Newbs (Tue Jun 23 09, 7:17PM)
posted by MaSch (Wed Jun 24 09, 4:35AM)
13% at Rotten Tomatoes, but most ratings at amazon are 3 to 4 stars. This either shows that those critics who reviewed the movie don't know what people like, or that the film company pays some people to write good reviews for amazon.
And we *know* that no company would be so pathetic to do *that*, don't we?
posted by The Gaucho (Wed Jun 24 09, 4:41AM)
If you spend 30 bucks on a film this bad, you *deserve* a turd like this.