obsession boyfriend i'm psyched girl crush i'm dreading enemy

(need an explanation?)

advertisements





when in Stratford-upon-Avon, U.K., I stay at
Adelphi Guest House




maryann buzz Sun Sep 20 09, 10:17AM
| comments (16)

is it “obsessive” to want to tell stories about women?

Is it just plain paranoia to suspect that a beautiful but not anorexic woman could get fired from a TV show for not being thin enough? Is there reason to hope that things could be changing for women in entertainment?

Yup, it’s The Week in Women, my weekly column over at the Alliance of Women Film Journalists. Enjoy.

(more below the ad... scroll down...)



see everything else tagged: Alliance of Women Film Journalists | Week in Women
(links here are good for finding recent posts, but will not be fully functional till I finish tagging 11 years worth of reviews and blog entries; I'll post a notice when tagging is done)
(more below the ad... scroll down...)



comments

"Follow your bliss." -- Joseph Campbell

It's no more obsessive than Woody Allen and Martin Scorsese's doing movies about New York, or Spike Lee doing them about the African American community.

Ask Joss Whedon.

@Paul: No kidding!

@MAJ: Is there some reason the responses are closed over the Alliance of Women Film Journalist site? Cuz I'd love to comment.

It's only obsessive if it's about the same woman.

It's only obsessive if it's about the same woman.

And she's underage and has a first name that starts with "L." (Then again, Dolores Haze's first name started with a "D" so maybe I should revise that rule...)

Clearly a poorly-worded question from the (male) interviewer, highlighting what is likely a widely-held subconscious belief and prejudice that causes him (and many others) to assume that male film-makers who tend to focus on complex female protagonists are somehow 'not normal' and must indicate some weird predilection on the part of the film-maker rather than just a desire to tell a good story.

From the article:

If it’s “obsessive” that women are the central figures of so many of the films of a single filmmaker, what are we to make of the fact that most films by most filmmakers — particularly those who come out of Hollywood — are centered around men? Should we see that as something pathological?

Well, aren't there some who do see that as something pathological? (And I can see why someone would think so.)

By the way, Kathryn Bigelow was asked (kind of) the gender-flipped question, i.e. why is it her movies are always about men?

The real question is: Are interviewers (present company excluded, of course) obsessed with asking idiotic questions when it comes to sex (in every meaning of the word)?

Is there some reason the responses are closed over the Alliance of Women Film Journalist site? Cuz I'd love to comment.

Yeah, I'm not in charge of whether or not comments are open or closed. Feel free to comment here about something I wrote there, though, if you like.

Well, aren't there some who do see that as something pathological? (And I can see why someone would think so.)

Well, sure. I do, for certain. But the mainstream does not. The mainstream sees stories about men as of interest to men and women alike, and universal in their application, yet stories about women are believed to be of interest only to women.

Have *you* ever seen a male filmmaker asked why all his movies are about men? No. Because that's assumed to be a normal state of affairs.

Didn't Cary Grant get pissed off at Hitchcock for being too obssessed with Ingrid Bergman, giving her all the best shots? Just a rumor I heard.

Exactly, MaryAnn.

Pixar is an excellent example of this male-centric paradigm: every single one of Pixar's family flicks has a male protagonist/hero, with female characters in supporting roles.

I once had a conversation about this with a producer friend who pointed out that culturally, women are conditioned/accustomed to identify with and root for male protagonists - this is the 'norm' - but the opposite does not apply to men, who are not conditioned to identify with and root for a female protagonists to nearly the same degree. Thus, a female protagonist in a Pixar movie would be considered financially too risky, with a female protagonist/heroine seen as appealing to girls but not boys, negating a huge chunk of likely ticket sales.

And the sad thing is, this is probably true to some extent. Thank goodness we have a few brilliant films like SPIRITED AWAY and CORALINE to counter this ridiculous double standard.

I once had a conversation about this with a producer friend who pointed out that culturally, women are conditioned/accustomed to identify with and root for male protagonists - this is the 'norm'

...BUT, funnily enough, if a female starts actually ACTING like a male protagonist, she is outside the "norm". We females are still supposed to identify with the females while we root for the males.


I sure love Pedro Almodovar's films...he has LOTS of interesting women.

For a bit I though Tarantino was going be obsessive with Uma , Its not the case but his thing for getting Umaish leads, makes me think thats he's not entirely over her. If the girl from Inglorious Basterds plays the new bride, then you can't say I'm being paranoid

If having a woman lead is the best way to tell the story at hand then do it. I've written a bunch of stories, the stories that need a male lead have a male. The stories that need a female have a female.

I don't really like chick flicks, they seemed forced and the guys neutered.

I don't really like macho male flicks, also forced and often very dumb.

I wrote a series that is a spin off from Doctor Who, it features a strong female lead, and those stories would suck any other way. But alas, they'll never see the light of day.

We should at least give Pixar points for having so many positive images of women. They're much more sympathetic and heroic than many of the women I see in live action films.

I sure love Pedro Almodovar's films...he has LOTS of interesting women.

Just this minute taken "Volver" out of the DVD drive.... Now that makes your point perfectly. The men only have bit parts, I doubt they have ten minutes screen time between them. Can't say I missed them.

post a comment

who I am


I'm MaryAnn Johanson: writer and ponderer in New York City who drinks too much wine and thinks way too much about such inconsequences as movies, TV, books, and the meaning of life.
[email me]
[become a Facebook fan]
[visit my personal Facebook page]
[follow me on Twitter]
[friend me on MySpace]

FlickFilosopher.com is available on Kindle

• contributor, Film.com
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences
• visit my scratchpad blog, MaryAnnJohanson.com
• read my Doctor Who fan fiction

photo by David Speranza

(postings feed)


top critic on Movie Review Query Engine


as seen on Rotten Tomatoes


member, Online Film Critics Society


member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists

Add to Technorati Favorites

monthly archives

recent screenings and hot movies

just opened (U.S.)
red for no The Twilight Saga: New Moon
yellow for maybe Planet 51
not viewed by me The Blind Side [trailer]
not viewed by me Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans [trailer]
yellow for maybe Broken Embraces
green for go Red Cliff [trailer]
yellow for maybe The Missing Person [trailer]
green for go Precious (expanding)
green for go Fantastic Mr. Fox (expanding)
just opened (U.K.)
red for no The Twilight Saga: New Moon
green for go A Serious Man
green for go The Informant!
box office top 5 (U.S.)
yellow for maybe 2012
red for no A Christmas Carol
green for go Precious
green for go The Men Who Stare at Goats
yellow for maybe Michael Jackson's This Is It
top limited releases (U.S.)
green for go Precious
red for no The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day
green for go An Education
green for go A Serious Man
yellow for maybe Coco Before Chanel
box office top 5 (U.K.)
yellow for maybe 2012
red for no A Christmas Carol
not viewed by me Harry Brown
green for go Up
green for go The Men Who Stare at Goats
coming soon (U.S./U.K.)
red for no The Loss of a Teardrop Diamond
yellow for maybe Serious Moonlight [trailer]
yellow for maybe A Single Man [trailer]
green for go Everybody's Fine [trailer]
red for no The Strip
green for go The Private Lives of Pippa Lee [trailer]
green for go The Young Victoria [trailer]
green for go Creation [trailer]
green for go The Road [trailer]
green for go The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus [trailer]
other current flicks (U.S./U.K.)
green for go Amelia
red for no Antichrist [trailer]
red for no Astro Boy
yellow for maybe The Box
green for go The Boys Are Back
green for go Bright Star
green for go Capitalism: A Love Story [trailer]
yellow for maybe Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant
yellow for maybe Collapse
red for no Couples Retreat
green for go Creation [trailer]
green for go The Damned United
green for go An Education
green for go Five Minutes of Heaven
yellow for maybe The Fourth Kind
red for no Gentlemen Broncos [trailer]
green for go The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus [trailer]
green for go The Invention of Lying
red for no Jennifer's Body
green for go The Messenger [trailer]
green for go Ong Bak 2: The Beginning
yellow for maybe Paranormal Activity
red for no Pirate Radio (aka The Boat That Rocked)
yellow for maybe A Single Man [trailer]
yellow for maybe Where the Wild Things Are
red for no Whiteout
red for no Women in Trouble
green for go Zombieland

2009 screening log

new on dvd

11.17 (Region 1)
green for go Star Trek [buy]
green for go Humpday [buy]
green for go Bruno [buy]
green for go Is Anybody There? [buy]
yellow for maybe The Limits of Control [buy]
yellow for maybe My Sister's Keeper [buy]
yellow for maybe How to Be [buy]
green for go Farscape: The Complete Series [buy]
green for go Gone with the Wind: 70th Anniversary Ultimate Collector's Edition [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.S.)

11.16 (Region 2)
green for go Star Trek [buy]
green for go Moon [buy]
green for go Sunshine Cleaning [buy]
yellow for maybe Four Christmases [buy]
yellow for maybe Tyson [buy]
green for go An Evening with John Barrowman [buy]
green for go Doctor Who: The Key to Time [buy]
green for go South Park: Christmas Time in South Park [buy]
green for go Star Trek Trilogy [buy]
green for go Star Trek: The Next Generation Movie Collection [buy]
green for go Star Trek: Films 1-10 Remastered Special Edition [buy]
yellow for maybe Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles Season 2 [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.K.)

11.10 (Region 1)
green for go Up [buy]
red for no The Ugly Truth [buy]
green for go The Sarah Jane Adventures: The Complete Second Season [buy]
green for go Ink [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.S.)

11.09 (Region 2)
green for go Bruno [buy]
yellow for maybe The Age of Stupid [buy]
red for no Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian [buy]
green for go The Sarah Jane Adventures: The Complete Second Season [buy]
green for go All Creatures Great and Small: Christmas Specials [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.K.)

11.03 (Region 1)
green for go The Taking of Pelham 123 [buy]
green for go Thicker Than Water: The Vampire Diaries Part 1 [buy]
yellow for maybe Food, Inc. [buy]
red for no G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra [buy]
red for no Aliens in the Attic [buy]
red for no I Love You, Beth Cooper [buy]
green for go North by Northwest (50th Anniversary Edition) [buy]
green for go Doctor Who: The War Games [buy]
green for go Doctor Who: The Black Guardian Trilogy [buy]
green for go National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation (Ultimate Collector's Edition) [buy]
green for go Mission: Impossible: Complete Series [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.S.)

11.02 (Region 2)
green for go Public Enemies [buy]
yellow for maybe Last Chance Harvey [buy]
red for no Year One [buy]
red for no Blood: The Last Vampire [buy]
green for go Wallace and Gromit: The Complete Collection [buy]
(complete list of this week's new releases at Amazon U.K.)

my book (Amazon U.S.)

my book (Amazon U.K.)

advertisements

search

Google
flickfilosopher.com
web