I like Seth MacFarlane, and from what I've seen of his other shows I'm pretty sure the *intent* is to send up those stereotypes, not reinforce them. How well he accomplishes this may be in question.

On the other hand, we run into the problem of white-male protagonists can have every negative feature under the sun, and for most people it's just funny -- Homer Simpson, Peter Griffin, etc.

It's a fine line between not making non-white male characters blandly perfect so as to not offend anyone, and not coming across as racist or sexist if you make all characters equally vile in the name of comedy. Whether Seth MacFarlane has the sensitivity and skill to pull this off will remain to be seen.

I'm inclined to agree with bzero, though I'm not so sure of McFarlane's harmless intentions at all times. Sometimes I've seen genuine viciousness beneath a too-thin disguise of harmless lampooning.

OTOH, overreaction isn't helpful. Is it really reasonable to suggest that using a white actor to voice a black cartoon character is the same thing as blackface?

A bit off-topic, but one problem I have with all of this is that some of these stereotypes are very stale and overused. Flogging dead horses is characteristic of McFarlane (my theory is that his ego convinces him that he can succeed in making an old joke funny again where others have failed).

I don't think complexity and stereotypes are opposites, or at least they're not mutually exclusive. A developed character can have traits that reflect stereotypes. That's a staple of sitcoms, and it's almost necessary for satire.

"...young black boys as sexual deviants..."

This is a stereotype? Maybe I'm sheltered, but I've not seen this portrayed very often, myself.

The only thing wrong with The Cleveland Show is taht it's a direct copy of Family Guy with different characters. Every critique listed here can also be applied to the parent series, which means there's nothing inherently racist about the show (despite the accuracy of the criticism).

It's just a dumb show and it's only "racist" because it features black people being dumb instead of white people.

On second thought:

...in just 22 minutes they managed to portray black mothers as unmarried promiscuous sexual objects

black teenage girls as headed down the same path as their mothers

young black boys as sexual deviants, and black people period as being unable to speak anything other than Ebonics — all in the name of comedy.

This entire quote infuriates me.

I don't think anyone should be "protected" from satire, black, white, Hispanic, etc....Are Cleveland Show's jokes worse than Eddie Murphy's mockery of white guys as uptight nebbishes? Apples and oranges, maybe, and i have not seen this show myself. Although from what I know of Family Guy, the comedy of the Cleveland show is probably as crass and obvious, which is not necessarily a bad thing. Frankly I think people need to chill out w/ the political correctness...as someone repping a minority w/ its own history of oppression I've seen plenty of similar comedic attempts to send up my people. i only get offended when it's not funny.

"... the delight of white audiences from coast to coast." I really doubt that, but OTOH American Dad somehow lasted beyond its pilot.

If you cant stand Family guy it's probably going over your head. Big surprise, considering the kind of shows you drool over.
It's also no surprise, then that you don't realize that the problem with TCS is that it's not funny, not that it has stereotypes. But nice to see you falling over backwards to be PC and send out a swift critique for a show you, of course, haven't even seen.

Copy-pasted from the last time I said this in the I Hope They Serve Beer In Hell thread, because people are predictable:

This is some weird new hypocrisy that I seem to be noticing all over the place these days; anyone who's upset about racism, misogyny, homophobia etc is a vicious, censorious, stuck-up crybaby, but anyone who's upset about someone criticising Tucker Max or Family Guy or something... well, that's important stuff! Why won't the world take them seriously? They are surely the most oppressed class of people in America today and we must treat their pitiful mewling with the gravitas it deserves.

"I'm so much more unshockable and mature than you, you PC liberal scold! Now will you please stop being a big meanie and start liking my favourite show, or I might cry!"

The definition of "not a stereotype" is NOT "bland and perfect." The opposite of "stereotype" is a complex, flawed, realistic, *individual* character. Characters can be vile and still not stereotypical.

I do agree with you there, but on the same token I'm not sure you could say the original pilot of Family Guy wasn't filled with just as many white stereotypes as cardboard cutouts to hang jokes on. Of course, since you don't like Family Guy, that's not much of a defense, but my point was more that it's not necessarily racist in intent even if it comes off that way in execution.

As a sort-of fan of MacFarlane's work--that is: pre-cancellation "Family Guy" (1999-2002) and "American Dad!", and a detractor of everything else he's done; it's not entirely unfounded that "The Cleveland Show" skirts on racism. But in fairness, if the show said that *all* black people were buffoonish or were *all* one way or another then I'd be in the "yes, it's a minstrel show" camp. As it stands, it's what it advertises to be: "'Family Guy' with an afro." Everybody in the MacFarlane universe basically gets made fun of unmercifully.

Unfortunately his more successful shows "FG" and "TCS" rely waaaaaaay too much on shock humor than on that wonderfully catty, snarky dialogue sometimes shines through.

Oh well. Long Live "American Dad!"

Cleveland Brown has always been a too-nice guy that tries to fix the problems of the people he cares about, whether he's the one who's at all part of the problem or not.

And there's a white stereotypical redneck across the street.

and a fucking BEAR living next door.

yeah. it's so realistically, believably rooted in reality that i can't help but think it's racist.

dumbasses.

No one is sticking up for russian bears in all this, are we to believe they are all cynical creatures who sneek smokes when taking out the garbage and make wise remarks when someone says "Oh a bear"

Just sayin'

I saw it, had some funny moments, not as good as family guy but funnier than American Dad. So it works on some levels. Racist, I wouldn't say that at all.

I pretty much agree with everything Newbs said. Maryann, I don't blame you for raising the question, since you phrased it hypothetically rather than asserting an opinion on a show you hadn't seen, but the person you're quoting is full of it. I watched the first episode and I don't know where she saw these alleged stereotypes. The family had fairly middle-of-the-road conservative (not politically speaking) behaviors. The mother was certainly not promiscuous- she had an ex-husband, but then she left him again to marry Cleveland. It's not suggested she had sex with anyone else. The daughter dresses provocatively and is probably sexually active with her boyfriend, but she is in a steady relationship with him. Cleveland, Jr. is a stereotype of "the fat kid (his character design is identical to Steve's fat friend on American Dad, save for skin color)," but there's no black stereotype in his actions. I wonder how he went from the hyperactive sports fan to the fat kid, but I think that may have been explained in a Family Guy ep. I didn't see. The young boy, Rollo, was kind of creepy, in that he's a five year old sex fiend, but I'm not aware that that's a black stereotype either. No one on the show speaks Ebonics on a regular basis. The only one who might be considered a racial stereotype is the ex-husband Robert, who doesn't support his kids, but that's balanced out by what a good provider Cleveland is, even caring for kids who aren't his.

So I disagree strongly with this assessment. If she didn't like the show, fine, but she'll need better reasons. Personally, I thought it was not overly funny but kind of sweet and had good character development. With a sitcom, I think it's most important that the early episodes establish the characters as memorable personalities- that way, in future episodes the jokes flow naturally from the characters rather than being artificial "setup-punchline." Some early Simpsons episodes were almost painfully unfunny, but they built up the characters so that they could be very funny later.

All-in-all, I think this is, dare I say it, rampant political correctness. It reminds me of one of Greg Weisman's stories about developing Gargoyles. He said they originally planned on having an overweight female gargoyle named Coco. In a show of what he now calls cowardice, they changed the overweight gargoyle to male, because they were afraid that if they made her anything less than perfect, it'd be read as making fun of fat women. Making fun of fat men is more acceptable, I guess. It seems to me like the same thing is going on with The Cleveland Show- the black characters aren't perfect, so they're dismissed as stereotypes.

The definition of "not a stereotype" is NOT "bland and perfect." The opposite of "stereotype" is a complex, flawed, realistic, *individual* character.

I agree with this completely, but I think the Cleveland characters are closer to the latter than the former, and certainly not ethnic stereotypes.