my week at the movies: ‘Up in the Air,’ ‘The Lovely Bones,’ ‘The Princess and the Frog,’ ‘Ninja Assassin’
Is there any such thing as too many George Clooney movies in a single year? I don’t think so. I’ve barely come out of my swoon over The Men Who Stare at Goats -- and yeah, he’s kinda sexy in Fantastic Mr. Fox too; it’s that voice -- and now there’s Up in the Air (opens in the U.S. in limited release on December 4 and wide on December 25; it open in the U.K. on January 15, 2010). Could we arrange to have a new Clooney movie every month? That would awesome.
Screenings do not stop over holiday weeks -- and this time of year is the busiest of all, what with all the awards contenders the studios are desperate to get in front of awards voters (I vote in the Online Film Critics Society awards and the EDA Awards given by the Alliance of Women Film Journalists). So back-to-back with Up in the Air on Friday, I’ll see The Lovely Bones (opens in the U.S. in limited release on December 11 and wide on January 15, 2010; it opens in the U.K. on January 29, 2010). Looks like I picked the exact right time to read the book: I’ll be slapping the book shut on my subway ride down to see the movie, most likely (if not sooner).
I still haven’t been forgiven by Disney, so I have not been invited to a press screening of The Princess and the Frog (opens in New York and Los Angeles on November 25, and wide across North America on December 11; opens in the U.K. on February 5, 2010). So I’ll do what I usually do in such cases: I’ll buy a ticket and go see the movie on opening day. (Though I will not be doing this in the case of Disney’s Old Dogs, which makes me want to vomit just watching the TV ads.)
What’s happening with Frog, however, is that when they say “exclusive engagements,” they’re really not kidding this time. The movie will be playing for two weeks or so only at the legendary Ziegfeld in New York, and on the Disney lot in Los Angeles. But you cannot buy a ticket for just the movie: your ticket also includes admission to “The Ultimate Disney Experience” where you can “meet all the Disney princesses,” see props and costumes, and other stuff supposedly suitable for the whole family. You don’t wanna see “The Ultimate Disney Experience,” they’re not gonna force you to. But you’re gonna pay for it anyway.
And here’s the killer. The price tag for all this? $30. And that’s for the cheap tickets, the general admission tickets. If you want “Royal” tickets -- which do at least include reserved seating, so you don’t have to fight a gaggle of overexcited munchkins and their overexhausted parents for seats -- you are gonna pay $50.
Fifty bucks. For a movie and the chance to say hello to some out-of-work actresses playing dressup, and desperately happy to have some cash in their pockets for the holidays that they will be so supercheery you’ll wonder what drugs they’re on.
As I write this, the 4pm and 7pm shows in New York on Wednesday, opening day, are sold out -- remember, at $30 and $50 a pop -- and the 10am, 1pm, and 9:30pm are close to it; much of the rest of the holiday weekend is also sold out. The Los Angeles shows are even harder to get tickets for at this point.
I will be there at 10am on Wednesday (I plunked down my money weeks ago). Disney doesn’t wanna talk to me these days? Fine. I showed them: I bought their damn $50 ticket. Let’s see how they like that.
While all the good little critics are attending a press screening of The Princess and the Frog tonight, I will finally learn the secret of Ninja Assassin (opens in the U.S. on November 25 and the U.K. on November 27), as beautifully expressed by Drave in comments on the trailer:
It's grammatically ambiguous! Is he a ninja who is also an assassin, or is he an assassin who targets ninjas? Inquiring minds want to know!
I’m dying to find out.
comments
posted by Mimi (Mon Nov 23 09, 2:16PM)
Hell. No. There is not.
Not only is he, you know, GEORGE CLOONEY, he has good taste--his movies tend to be *good,* or at the very least different/interesting.
posted by doa766 (Mon Nov 23 09, 5:26PM)
I couldn't finish The Lovely Bones, it bored me, don't know what Peter Jackson saw in there that would make a great movie but the few people who has seen it say that it's oscar worthy
for one thing it's rated PG-13 and that seems wrong, I guess the first chapter of the book won't be there then
posted by Paul (Mon Nov 23 09, 5:32PM)
Well, since both assassin and ninja include killing people for money in their job description, the title is either redundant or the character is killing paid killers for money. However, ninjas do have a broader job description (being a spy or thief is not beneath them, of course, in the Japanese social heirarchy, the only thing beneath ninjas is mud) and assassins are sometimes politically motived instead, and it is quite possible that the company is playing fast and loose with the title's exact meaning, so this is all just speculation.
posted by kevin (Mon Nov 23 09, 10:57PM)
What happened to Me and Orsen Wells? My daughter is a huge Zack Efron fan and has been waiting for that movie for quite some time. Is it even opening this week?
posted by M. Carter @ the Movies (Tue Nov 24 09, 3:49PM)
If you'd asked me a few years back if I could sit through several George Clooney movies in one year, I'd have said "hell no." But then the guy won me over with gonzo performances like the one in "Burn After Reading," and playing antiheroes a la "Michael Clayton." He's become an actor with incredible range and a keen ability to test himself by taking on eclectic projects. I can't wait to see what he does in "Up in the Air."
M. Carter @ the Movies
http://mcarteratthemovies.wordpress.com/
posted by MaryAnn (Tue Nov 24 09, 10:35PM)
I weep for anyone who does not see the beauty in this book...
It opens in extremely limited release (4 screens) tomorrow. I haven't seen it, but I might check it out next week.
If anyone had told me while Clooney was on *ER* that I'd be this madly in love with him 10 years later, I'd have laughed. I couldn't stand him on that show (which I loved, overall) -- and I'm not someone who confuses an actor with the character he's playoning. Because I didn't think he was a very good actor back then, and I hated what he did with Doug Ross (and I hated even more than so many women thought Ross was charming when he was clearly the worst kind of asshole). But now my crush on him is about how smart and creative and talented he is, and not so much that he's totally cute (though he is, of course).