question of the day: Is there an anti anti-smoking backlash forming?Some people are bitching about the smoking in Avatar, which is more of the same-old, same-old we’ve been hearing for years now: smoking is evil, won’t someone think of the children, lighting up is worse than murder (at least on film), etc. Now, I’m not a smoker and I never enjoyed being in a smoky bar or -- worse -- a smoky restaurant, and I do think that smoking is probably one of the most dangerous legal things you can do to your body. But I get really pissed off at the prim puritanism behind the anti-smoking cadres, as well as at the denial of reality that accompanies calls for images of smoking to be banned or heavily regulated in our entertainment. People do smoke: other people need to deal with that fact. And I wonder whether there isn’t a bit of a pushback happening against those attitudes. There’s Mad Men, of course, the 1960s-era series of which every episode floats along through a haze of cigarette smoke. (A few years earlier, the U.K., which has been going through its own creeping tobacco prohibition, saw a similar historical reveling in smoking in the 1970s-set Life on Mars. The American version, conversely, acted as if no one in 1970s New York ever smoked.) And now we have the just-debuted Caprica, in which Eric Stoltz’s technology mogul smokes... and he’s not even an outright villain, for whom cigarettes are typically reserved these days. And there’s also Legion, in which the modern mother-to-be of the next Jesus smokes unrepentently while pregnant... and she’s certainly no villain, either. Is this all just coincidence? Or is there an anti anti-smoking backlash forming in popular entertainment? (If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me. Responses to this QOTD sent by email will be ignored; please post your responses here.) Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus |
posted:
Mon Jan 25 10, 11:48AM categories: talk amongst yourselves permalink 19 pre-Disqus comments Disqus comments tip jarshare
read morerelated· question of the day: If you had a magic wand, which bits of offensive TV would you censor for yourself? · who is Ebert protege Ignatiy Vishnevetsky?; Hollywood hates Netflix; the FCC delivers smackdowns to broadcasting’s old guard; more: leftover links · female gazing at: Eric Stoltz · question of the day: If Eric Stoltz could have been Marty McFly, what other 80s movies might have been differently cast? · watch it: 1980s European Volkswagen Beetle commercial · U.K. box office: ‘Alice’ pummels ‘Avatar’ · North American box office: ‘Avatar’ is 7 weeks at No. 1 · North American box office: ‘Avatar’ is unstoppable · question of the day: What movie are you most looking forward to in January? · Priest (review) bloggyprevious post: Wii of the weekend: ‘Toy Story Mania!’ next post: trailer break: ‘Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief’ |









pre-Disqus comments
posted by Brian (Mon Jan 25 10, 12:06PM)
One force you can never ignore is the fact that smoke is one of those things that almost always looks great on film. The visual atmosphere is super-cool, with the bonus that you don't have to smell it.
Smoking is also one of the easiest shorthand symbols of rebellion. (You're a BSG fan, so you know the Ron Moore team loves to show people smoking in inappropriate situations, viz. Doc Cottle.) As conformist as filmed entertainment may be in many other dimensions, most artists would like to be seen as being anti-establishment, and prudes are always an easy target. So, like teenagers, they tend to gravitate toward cigarettes as a cheap and easy way to stick it to the Man.
posted by ashok (Mon Jan 25 10, 12:09PM)
As far as real life goes, there's been a very strong anti anti-smoking movement for at least as long as they've been banning smoking in public places. And I think it's been reflected in pop culture for a while with little sideways digs in everything from TV to standup.
posted by mortadella (Mon Jan 25 10, 12:36PM)
Most likely there is. There's such an air of valetudinarian facism these days, I feel like there's always some self-appointed authority out there suggesting,"If you ingest alcohol, sodium or sugar, you're a bad BAD person!"
Frankly,some of these people (like the folks who kicked up a fuss about Avatar)piss me off. They think morality and health advocacy are one in the same...or something like that.
When groups of so-called concerned citizens try to deny the existence of a bad habit like smoking, I feel like it's an attempt to infantilize the rest of us.
posted by Dr. Rocketscience (Mon Jan 25 10, 1:14PM)
But things like sugar, sodium and fat are in fact essential nutrients. Cut them completely from your intake and you would likely die. Tobacco, on the other hand, is unequivocally bad for you. One might argue that so is alcohol. But alcohol has a very long history on its side. There have been teetotalers for probably 2 days less than there's been controlled fermentation. But despite modern temperance types who seem to have convinced them selves that Jesus himself turned water into grape juice, for long stretches of human history brewing beer and making wine were among the only reliable ways of avoiding dysentery from drinking the water.
As far as backlash, there aren't a lot of examples yet. And when they do show up, they seem to be more like storyteller shorthand for things like character and setting. For instance, Dr. Grace's call for a cigarette seems like short hand for "hard-driven type A personality, using tobacco and probably caffeine to fuel her workaholism". Note also that she's the only smoker in the movie. Neither Selfridge (Sleazy McCorporatist) nor Quaritch (Col. von Killsalot) nor Our Tortured Hero™ Jake "Sully" Sully touches a smoke or even comments on Grace's habit.
posted by Jim Mann (Mon Jan 25 10, 3:42PM)
I'm a vehement non-smoker and strongly supported laws making bars and restaurants smoke free. But I find the uproar over Avatar silly.
It's one thing to complain about movies that make smoking look like the cool thing to do. Or the ones that make it look like smoking is something everyone does and that they do it everywhere (instead of the reality that currently less than a quarter of the population smokes, most businesses ban smoking, and most private homes don't allow smoking). Some films over the years have in fact had parts that looked like a cigarette commercial. But that's not the case here.
posted by Paul (Mon Jan 25 10, 5:10PM)
ditto Jim. I thought Grace's character was supposed to be a rough edged persona. I think Grace was smoking as a form of self-medication because she really didn't like people or life very much. I wonder if it was on purpose that she seemed nicer and happier in her Avatar body, and never once seemed to miss her cigerettes.
posted by JoshB (Mon Jan 25 10, 6:14PM)
Yeah, bunch of Darwin Award candidates.
posted by Laurie Mann (Mon Jan 25 10, 8:42PM)
Jim beat me to that.
We've always been "fascist non-smokers" - no one has ever been allowed to smoke in our house (and we've been married since 1977). That said, said, to judge that smoking is worse than swearing, overt sexual displays and violence in movies is nutty.
Many good people have bad habits, so to pretend that only "bad guys" are smokers is a horrible trend. Likewise, the old glamorization of smoking of smoking in the media was wrong and is currently almost non-existent (except in some print ads).
Smoking used to be more common historically so to edit it from history is also completely wrong.
posted by Victor Plenty (Tue Jan 26 10, 3:10AM)
If ever a technology is invented to let the person sitting next to me fill their lungs with toxic waste products, yet somehow prevent them from emitting those same toxins and carcinogens into the air that I also have to breathe, I will be the first to defend their right to do whatever they want to their own body. Until them I will favor every measure that isolates smoking from all indoor public spaces, and most of the outdoor spaces, too.
(I'm also against prohibition of alcohol, even though I don't use it myself. That won't change until and unless people start thinking the only way they can enjoy their tasty alcohol beverage is to spit part of it down my throat.)
Despite my stance on the real world practice, which I'm sure some will find extremist, the smoking in Avatar is no big deal. Sure, I found it unpleasant to watch for the handful of seconds the odious practice was portrayed on screen, but that's hardly worth mentioning in the overall viewing experience.
I'm even one of those repeat viewers whose very existence was lamented in other threads here. :) (Seen it twice now, and wouldn't mind seeing it two or three more times if I get the chance to compare the 2D and IMAX versions to the 3D version.)
posted by RogerBW (Tue Jan 26 10, 5:26AM)
At the Imperial War Museum Duxford, they have reconstructed one of the fighter control rooms as it was during WWII. Except that it's not an accurate reconstruction, becase they have removed all the ashtrays. (This is an exhibit: you can't walk into it, just look at it through the doorway, so they can't have been worried about people actually using them.)
I took up (pipe) smoking on the day England banned it in indoor public places.
posted by mortadella (Tue Jan 26 10, 9:47AM)
Victor, people spit part of their "tasty alcohol beverages" down your throat? Wow, uh, that's weird.
posted by Lawschool_Douchebag (Tue Jan 26 10, 10:19AM)
Smoking is disgusting and deplorable. Hollywood should not be allowed to show people smoking in their movies. It sends the message to kids that smoking is neato, and if you smoke, you too can be as cool as Maccaulay Culkin in The Good Son.
I dream of a world where smoking is illegal, along with protesting and twittering. Hopefully they will ban images of cigarettes in pop culture too. Cigarettes are dangerous, therefore, they should be deleted. I'm done with my rant now. I'm hopping on my motorcycle (without a helmet) and riding to the local McDonald's to eat a #4 (supersized) with a Diet Coke. Smoking kills!
posted by Accounting Ninja (Tue Jan 26 10, 11:33AM)
Har dee har har, Douchebag.
One of my guilty pleasures is cigars and clove cigarettes. My husband is pretty militantly anti-smoking, so I only indulge when he is away and doesn't have to smell it. I even smoked regular cigs at 18 for a year or so, when I went through a rebellious phase.:) But I stopped and, even with my occasional indulgences, I've never gotten addicted.
As far as movies go, it's no big deal to me. My own family smoking (and drinking!) had more of an influencial effect on my habits than any movie. And like Laurie said, many good people smoke. It's not evil. My own grandmother smoked like a chimney for 40 years until she finally quit.
posted by MaryAnn (Tue Jan 26 10, 11:45AM)
I wonder if that's part of the reason behind the usage of smoking in *Caprica*: to indicate that this is "the past" in the same way that smoking on *Mad Men* and *Life on Mars* is a deliberate indicator of another (less enlightened/more free -- take your pick) time.
posted by Victor Plenty (Tue Jan 26 10, 4:48PM)
Mortadella, I can't tell whether I'm failing to get your joke, or I just failed to make it clear that was a metaphor.
posted by CB (Tue Jan 26 10, 6:00PM)
Heh. This reminds me of the people who were complaining about all the swearing in Saving Private Ryan. "Oh I know that soldiers do and did actually swear, but do you have to have it in the movie?" Um, yeah. If you're even pretending to be accurate, yeah.
Removing ashtrays from a museum exhibit? That's crazy! What's next -- the American History museum removing all references to racism and slavery in the Civil War exhibit?!
Racism is a very bad habit you know, and if the kids see you doing it they might think it's "cool".
I can't wait for the 'updated' version of Blazing Saddles. :)
posted by Bluejay (Tue Jan 26 10, 6:04PM)
posted by CB (Tue Jan 26 10, 6:20PM)
I wonder if that's part of the reason behind the usage of smoking in *Caprica*: to indicate that this is "the past"
Naw, it's to indicate that they're evil which is why they're going to make Cylons, and why the Cylon revolt will be their comeuppance.
Though they probably would have gotten away with it if they had just explained to the centurions that second-hand smoke doesn't affect them...
posted by Mark B. (Wed Jan 27 10, 6:36PM)
It's ridiculous. There's even a silly bias against so-called "historical smoking" -- in Pearl Harbor (World War II) and Flyboys (World War I), smoking was pretty much expunged even though folks in the military (and outside it for that matter) smoked like chimneys back in the day, and the latter film featured many scenes in which the fighter pilots had no problem whatsoever pickling their livers in makeshift, "Swamp-like" bars.
Worse still was how Clint Eastwood had to semi-justify his character's cigarette habit in Gran Torino -- a deliberate characterization choice (and major plot element) -- even though it's made clear that he's dying partially as a result of it and even though several other people in the movie call him to task for continuing to smoke. None of that matters.
We do still live in a country that values freedom of expression, right? Just checking.