trailer break: ‘Dinner for Schmucks’

Take a break from work: watch a trailer...

Why, Bruce Greenwood, why?! And Ron Livingston? Why?

Oh, wait, now I get it: The schmucks are the kiss-ass employees who actually go along with this assholery. The big boss is in fact looking for someone to stand up to him, to not be a schmuck.

Or else the schmucks are everyone who agreed to appear in this movie. See, it’s a game that Hollywood execs play among themselves: Who can get to star in the stupidest movie ever? And they all have big laughs as they one-up each other. “Paul Rudd? Bah: he’s a bad-movie slut. Top Steve Carell!” “Ha-ha! I’ll see your Ron Livingston, and I’ll raise you Bruce Greenwood! Top that!

Dinner for Schmucks opens in the U.S. and Canada on July 30, and in the U.K. on August 20.

support


pre-Disqus comments

Well, the original "Dîner des cons" (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119038/) wasn't that bad as far as i remember. Of course, i was 17 when i last saw it.
And it wasn't a US-remake.


I saw the original, too, and it was actually really sweet! However, I suspect that this remake will completely miss the point...

Why did I even try to watch the trailer? I could have predicted every single move. BORing.

It's actually a decent cast but based on the trailer appears to fall pretty short. Paul Rudd is rather funny though so I'll probably see the film anyway.

Why hate on a movie you haven't seen? I saw it at a preview in Sacramento and everybody was howling. I got to be part of the focus group and it received a unanimous must see recommend. The trailers and TV commercials don't capture the tone or the jokes. It ranks with the all-time hilarious buddy comedies like Planes Trains and Automobiles.

Why hate on a movie you haven't seen?

I'm hating on the trailer, not the movie.

I saw it at a preview in Sacramento and everybody was howling.

Yes, and as the performance of *Grown Ups* has demonstrated, if audiences like it, it must be smart and witty and clever.

It ranks with the all-time hilarious buddy comedies like Planes Trains and Automobiles.

If I feel the same way after I see the film, I'll certainly say as much. That doesn't make the trailer look any less moronic.

I think it looks hilarious, to be honest. Every once in a while, it's perfectly fine to enjoy a film that isn't witty and clever, and I think this film could be one of those times.

Speaking of remakes, IMDb says Martin Scorsese will be making a film called "Cache." I know this isn't the proper article in which to talk about this, but does anyone know if this will be a remake of Haneke's "Cache?" I need to know before I disappointedly call full-time on the career of one of my idols.

Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Mon Jul 12 10, 11:36AM

categories:
movie buzz




7 pre-Disqus comments
Disqus comments


tip jar





share


 
 


read more




related


· Dinner for Schmucks (review)
· female gazing at: Paul Rudd
· trailer break: ‘Flipped’
· question of the weekend: What does the word ‘schmuck’ mean to you?
· trailer break: ‘Star Trek’ trailer 2
· trailer break: ‘Star Trek’
· female gazing at: Bruce Greenwood
· Star Trek (review)
· trailer break: ‘The Time Traveler’s Wife’
· WWII in HD (review)


bloggy


previous post:
question of the day: If you were a supervillain, to what use would you put your mad sweet power?

next post:
what he said: ‘Guardian’ film critic Peter Bradshaw...

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)