wtf: ‘The Hurt Locker,’ for reals

I have no doubt that when historians look back at us from two thousand years in the future, they will sneer and express shock at reality television in the way that we sneer and express shock at the Roman spectacles of throwing Christians to the lions. Reality TV simply is that barbaric. And now, it gets worse! Via Cinematical comes the news of a new series inspired by The Hurt Locker... as well as, presumably, by the fact that people in lots of places are kindly asking us to vacate their countries with strategically placed IEDs:

Bomb Patrol: Afghanistan will follow a US Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal unit through basic training and tag along for a several month deployment to Afghanistan. For some reason I don't think there'll be any over-the-top Jeremy Renner types on this program.

Oh, I’m sure Cinematical’s Alison Nastasi is completely wrong: Where would the entertainment value of this show be without a fucked-up Jeremy Renner type?

G4 President Neal Tiles explained the rationale behind the decision: "There is simply no way to comprehend the incredible amount of pressure and split-second decision making these individuals must undertake in the worst possible physical conditions without riding along with them as our cameras will do. This is a rare opportunity to showcase the work of the courageous men and women on the front lines and share with our viewers all the real-life drama, teamwork, danger and triumph that goes along with this specialized job."

See? It’s a public service. It’s supporting the troops. And the only way it can be done is through the magic and the wonder of television. It’s noble.

Imagine what the Roman emperors could have done with TV. There’d be a moving fictional drama about soldiers stationed along Hadrian’s Wall. There’d be news reports about the insurgency among the Germanic tribes who didn’t appreciate the Roman legions bringing civilization to them. And there’d be a reality show about the trials of being a gladiator in the Coliseum.

And today’s historians would write theses about how propagandistic it all was.

But hey, when we do it, it’s a rare opportunity to blah blah blah. So enjoy!

support


pre-Disqus comments

Actually... this sounds pretty interesting. Most reality television is meaningless tripe; this sounds like it has the potential to be very meaningful indeed, at least on the surface.

I get where the cynicism is coming from, but I'll give this show a chance based on the subject matter.

I can only stand reality tv when it's a gameshow, because then all pretense of this being anyones real life goes out the window. In fact I still can't stand Big Brother or The Bachelor/ette because it's too little game for my tastes.

I don't care who you are when there is a camera in the room who you are the "Observer Effect" kicks in and you are someone different.

I hope I'll still alive when the boom of reality tv ends, everytime I have to watch and add for the new Big Brother or something like that my soul dies a little. Like you said, it's like the gladiators, that and bullfighting, why doesn't everyone see how barbaric those shows and that "sport" are?

Sounds kind of interesting if done well. But it's probably just in the vein of 'Most Dangerous Jobs' and you have to wade through lots of cheesy voice over, fancy/cheesy graphics and endless repetition for the ad breaks to sift any interesting insight.

Can't we have some new Super group-esque reality show by now though? Where Talib IEDs are sought out by aspiring young R&B singers or the cast of Jersey Shore?

In 2,000 years time it will be worse again. People will always want bread and circus.

Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Fri Aug 27 10, 4:57PM

categories:
tv buzz




5 pre-Disqus comments
Disqus comments


tip jar





share


 
 


read more




related


· watch it: “The 100 Greatest Movie Insults of All Time” (so NSFW)
· wtf: Steven Slater: The Reality Show
· wtf: AOL is still in the dialup business?
· question of the day: Does Jet Blue flight attendant Steven Slater deserve to be a folk hero?
· WTF? Natasha Richardson 1963-2009
· question of the weekend: How do we fix what’s wrong with American politics?
· question of the day: What makes a movie star a movie star, and has this changed over the Hollywood century?
· sign of the apocalypse No 1: the threatening Courtney Stodden/Doug Hutchinson reality show
· question of the day: What is the most positive, most productive concept for a reality show you can think of?
· question of the day: Is there no length to which ‘news’ networks will not go for a ‘story,’ to which audiences will not go for a ‘thrill,’ and to which parents will not go for public attention?


bloggy


previous post:
screencap Friday: what the flick? #138 -- now with prizes!

next post:
‘Doctor Who’ thing of the day: plimsolls of Rassilon

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)