about the voting up and down of comments

I hope the voting system will work here as the other community policing here has: not necessarily to agree or disagree with the content of a comment but as a way to approve or disapprove of how a comment is offered.

I mean, yes, definitely vote down trolls and those who have nothing significant to say but chime in with a “me, too!” or somesuch. Definitely vote down wild screaming vulgarity and pointless name-calling and other abuse.

I hope, though, that readers will not vote down well-written, thoughtful comments with which they merely disagree. Use that disagreement for a comment of substance and wit of your own in rebuttal.

Wit and humor is always deserving of an up vote. But don’t feel the need to vote on every comment: If you disagree with a comment but can’t fault its presentation, then simply slide on by to the next comment without voting.

The comment voting is a new thing here, and I know some readers are little nervous about it. I trust that we’re all smart enough and interested enough in intelligent, provocative, fun conversation to make it work to our collective advantage. If it starts to seem like it’s more disruptive than helpful, it is but the work of moments for me to strip out that code and eliminate the voting. But let’s give everyone some time to get used to it and figure out how to use it the Flick Filosopher way.

support


pre-Disqus comments

On the subject: it's a minor detail, but you might want to implement an IP block so we can't upvote our own comments... not that it really matters in the long run. I'm not sure if comment IPs are stored, but if so it would be pretty simple to compare the commenter to the voter.

It's not all that big a deal, as I said. And I'll probably get bored of upvoting myself eventually. Maybe!

implement an IP block so we can't upvote our own comments

But then how else would I get upvoted?

hrmf. i was definitely treating it like a agree/disagree button. didn't consider that that might not be its intended use. i suppose i might have gleaned that from the original post about comment voting if i read it more carefully, but i just assumed that the new feature was a way to track agreement -- which i was totally looking forward to. but ok, a "collaborative community filtering" thing sounds good, too.

Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Sun Sep 05 10, 12:29AM

categories:
maryann buzz




3 pre-Disqus comments
Disqus comments


tip jar





share


 
 




related


· on the origin of species (of Cars and Autobots)
· newsflash! readers love to read
· movies do matter (just ask the Tunisian police who refused to protect artists and filmgoers they don’t like)
· only known photo of Neil Gaiman and Douglas Adams together!
· Friday night fortune cookie: Ashley “Ash” J. Williams says...
· a bit of reshuffling of the content pages
· a moment of truth for FlickFilosopher.com
· advertising does not work online
· even warfare is a game of branding and PR these days
· David Tennant ‘Fright Night’ poster (for real this time)


bloggy


previous post:
my reads: ‘Death from the Skies!’ by Philip Plait, PhD

next post:
‘Moon’ and ‘Doctor Who’: “The Waters of Mars” are 2010 Hugo winners

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)