tres cool: no 3D for ‘Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows’Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I is rapidly barreling at us -- it releases on November 19 on both sides of the Atlantic -- which is good enough news, but now comes even better news for fans of not-sucky films everywhere: "Deathly Hallows: Part 1" becomes the first major pic to cancel a previously announced 3D release due to production problems. Why? Well, gee, turns out, it’s hard to make a 2D flick 3D, and it takes a lot of time. Who’da thunk such a thing, from the evidence of, say, Clash of the Titans? In the last few weeks, as it became clear that deadlines were slipping badly, both Imax and the studio began to scramble for alternatives. Imax put out "911" calls for emergency help to other 3D conversion companies but couldn't find enough takers to catch up. Amazing. Absolutely amazing. Deathly Hallows could have been performed by sock puppets and it still would have made a fortune. But now it’ll make a slightly smaller fortune, because a major corporation whose first priority is to its stockholders made a decision that’s operating on a timescale slightly further out than the current fiscal quarter, in that it worries about the longer-term reputation of the Harry Potter film franchise. Again: amazing. It’s not all good news, though: Warner's focus now shifts to converting "Deathly Hallows: Part 2," which the studio said will go out in 2D and 3D on July 15, 2011, as previously announced. and Warner's statement did not rule out the possibility of a limited 3D re-release of "Deathly Hallows: Part 1" in 2011, shortly before the July 15 release of "Part 2." In an indication Warner was still pondering its next move, as of Friday, some crews on the 3D conversion of "Part 1" had not been officially released. Doh! It’s Harry Potter. It doesn’t need to be in 3D to be amazing. Just leave it alone already. Sheesh. Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus |
posted:
Wed Oct 13 10, 9:13PM categories: movie buzz permalink Disqus comments tip jarshare
read morerelated· why no ‘Harry Potter’ this fall? · question of the day: Does an on-demand DVD business make sense? · tres cool: Justin Long is a nice guy · tres cool: The Female Character Flowchart · tres cool: ‘Errol & Olivia: Ego & Obsession in Golden Era Hollywood’ · tres cool: Localville News journalism at its finest · tres cool: ‘Star Wars’ propaganda posters · tres cool: “Thirty Five Images of Space Helmet Reflections” · trailer break: ‘Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows’ · Facebook smears Google; Disney trademarks “Seal Team 6”; men made ‘Bridesmaids’ suck; more: leftover links bloggyprevious post: Prime Suspect: The Complete Collection (review) next post: FlickFilosopher meetup in NYC on Sunday, November 7? |








