watch it: “Forbidden Images”

The filmmaker says:

All of the clips used in this film came from a reel of 35mm nitrate found in an old theater somewhere in Pennsylvania.

The projectionist clipped these scenes to meet local moral standards of the time.
Will our current forms of censorship look just as ridiculous to future generations?

I found this via Echidne of the Snakes, and I’ll let her explain one reason why this is so interesting:

The way the video is discussed [at YouTube], both in the blurb and in most of the comments is interesting. Very few notice that every single of these images is about women's bodies and none make the point that nothing having to do with just men seems to have been cut. But most interestingly of all, the overall theme is one where women's bodies are conflated with "daring sexuality," and the blurb urges people to think about what one might censor today, given that such innocent scenes were censored in the past.

In one sense, of course, absolutely nothing has changed. Sex is still all about women's bodies and people either want them covered up and hidden or freely available for public consumption.

I couldn’t have said it better myself.

(PS: You should be reading Echidne of the Snakes all the time if you’re interested in feminist matters.)

support


Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Mon Nov 01 10, 12:15PM

categories:
web video of the day




Disqus comments


tip jar





share


 
 


read more




related


· VS Naipaul isn’t just a sexist pig, he’s blindered to his own privilege
· question of the day: How much should the federal government censor American broadcast television?
· Fox News has no sense of humor; where the heck is the original ‘Tron’?; entire ‘Walking Dead’ writing staff fired; more: leftover links
· Jon Stewart loves Barbie; should government support the arts?; learning Na’vi; more: leftover links
· Warren Beatty vs Pauline Kael, MacGruber movie in trouble, more: leftover links
· watch it: “The 100 Greatest Movie Insults of All Time” (so NSFW)
· wtf: “Megan Fox Reveals She Wore 18-Inch Corset in New Flick”
· question of the day: Is “the gaze” (male or female) disempowering for the gazee?
· things you need to know: sexualized men’s bodies must be homoerotic, for who else would be looking but other men?
· oh, great: now women have to be sexy behind the camera, too


bloggy


previous post:
female gazing at: Lennie James

next post:
‘Doctor Who’ thing of the day: homemade Dalek

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)