question of the day: What makes a movie great?

The Guardian and the Observer film critics banded together recently to name the top 25 films in a variety of genres -- horror, sci-fi and fantasy, arthouse and drama, action, comedy, crime, romance; see the whole list of top films here -- and ended up picking one film to top them all as their official Best Movie Ever: Chinatown. Explaining their choice:

The Guardian's film critic, Peter Bradshaw, said: "Chinatown is such a powerful piece of myth-making, a brilliant evocation of Los Angeles as a spiritual desert." The Observer's Philip French considers it a movie of "near perfection", ending "unforgettably with the line 'Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown!'".

Alongside Nicholson, Chinatown features career-best performances from Faye Dunaway – who notoriously clashed on set with director Polanski – and legendary film-maker John Huston, who played sinister landowner Noah Cross. Polanski himself had a cameo as a stiletto-wielding hoodlum who slices Nicholson's nose open.

But nothing there really explains why this particular bit of mythmaking, this particular brilliant evocation, these particular fantastic performance are better than all the other films about which similar things could be said.

So, regardless of whether you love, hate, or are indifferent to listmaking; whether you love, hate, or are indifferent to Chinatown (or the other films on the genre lists): What makes a movie great? If a film must stand the test of time, is there an optimal age for a great film before it starts to feel dated? What are you personal criteria for cinematic greatness... and does it bother you when other film fans use different criteria?

(If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me. Responses to this QOTD sent by email will be ignored; please post your responses here.)

support


Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Wed Nov 03 10, 9:26AM

categories:
talk amongst yourselves




Disqus comments


tip jar





share


 
 


read more




related


· question of the day: Must we stop this obsession with movies based on reality?
· question of the day: What movie are you ashamed to admit you’ve never seen?
· question of the day: Has the Academy just made it too difficult for documentaries to qualify for the Oscars?
· question of the day: Is it too soon for an Amy Winehouse biopic?
· question of the day: Famous creative types pushing back against corporate greed: hot new trend or momentary pissing into the wind?
· question of the weekend: Should gruesome photos of famous dead people be plastered all over the media?
· question of the weekend: Are the London riots this week the inevitable consequence of consumerism, and are we likely to see more such unrest?
· question of the day: Is J.J. Abrams being a troll when he says, “If you’re so smart, you come up with a better ending for ‘Lost’”?
· question of the day: What the heck could J.K. Rowling be up to with Pottermore.com?
· question of the day: Should there be a retirement age for artists?


bloggy


previous post:
watch it: “A Tiny Apartment Transforms into 24 Room”

next post:
trailer break: ‘Inside Job’

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)