incontrovertible proof that mainstream journalism thinks you’re dumb, and dumbs its shit down for you

Ho. Lee. Shit. From Mediaite:

Christiane Amanpour Uses Such A Fancy Word, ABC Has To Define It In A Graphic

This is either unintentionally hilarious or merely bizarre, but either way it seemed worthy of some attention. On This Week, during an extremely sophisticated and insightful debate on the importance of the Constitution, Christiane Amanpour apparently attempted to keep the conversation at an elevated level of intelligence by showcasing an SAT-worthy word in the middle of her statement. Amanpour casually said “perspicacious,” yet dropping such a big word apparently served as a bat signal for the ABC graphics department to go into emergency action!

Amanpour’s guest mentioned Benjamin Franklin wrote that he wouldn’t mind being preserved in a “vat of Madeira wine” in order to see if the Constitution held up 200 years later. Amanpour responded, “he was amazingly perspicacious when this Constitution was signed.” Some viewers might want to roll their eyes in response to Amanpour’s use of such “elite” language, while others might appreciate that she doesn’t dumb down her thoughts for television. Either way, what was truly peculiar was the on-screen graphic. Were producers worried that the word would fly so far over their audience’s head that they needed to intervene as a public service? And if so, why not define “vat” and “Madeira wine” while you’re at it? Or is This Week now like Pop-Up Video with explanatory details and interesting facts popping up to complement what’s happening on screen?

This is what appeared onscreen on ABC:

But even Mediaite’s Matt Schneider thinks you’re stupid:

[I]f Amanpour herself was truly perspicacious, she might avoid using such fancy language so that viewers in the future don’t mistake her show for a Rosetta Stone class teaching the English language.

Mediaite is itself mainstream media, of course: it’s run by former MSNBC “personality” Dan Abrams.

I hereby vow never to decide I need to define a word for you, or dumb my language down lest you think I’ve mistaken my writing for a Rosetta Stone class teaching the English language.

support


Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Mon Jul 11 11, 8:02PM

categories:
tv buzz




Disqus comments


tip jar





share


 
 


read more




related


· zombie Beatles; 'Iron Man 2' sexist?; good-bye, 'Heroes'; more: leftover links
· question of the day: Is chimp-attack victim Charla Nash being exploited by Oprah and other news organizations?
· the Internet demands authenticity? (and other adventures in social networking)
· The Rum Diary (trailer)
· question of the day: Why do Americans love the Super Bowl so much?
· I am ABC News’ go-to girl for Oscar predictions...
· question of the day: Is atheism standing in the way of an Emmy for Bill Maher?
· note to journalists: when the people in power don’t like your tone, you’re doing something right
· wtf: Keith Olbermann off the air?!
· watch it: Rachel Maddow and Jon Stewart have a civilized discussion about journalism


bloggy


previous post:
chat with ‘Insidious’ James Wan and Leigh Whannell tonight on Facebook

next post:
on the unseemly power of those crazy feminist bitches (or not) when it comes to making moves about women

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)