the cruelest comment ever posted on the InternetI know, I know: There’s been a lot of mean, heartless shit posted by trolls and assholes on the Web, but I really do think we have a winner here. Posted by someone taking the brave stance of “Guest” -- just a smidge above “Anonymous” -- in response to my review of The Tree of Life: Honestly, this review reads like a woman who has finally realized that she needs to kill herself right now. This is someone who has failed in every aspect of life and is venting out like a feminist child. It's a mighty failure; a failure of weight loss, a failure of a film review, and most of all a failure of being a woman. Please put a gun to your head, you failure of a human being. I posted a response there: Let's assume for the moment that you actually believe this is true, that I am suicidal and on the point of killing myself. Your comment could then very well serve as the thing that pushed me over the edge into actually doing the deed. Recall that this commenter, since he disagrees with my take on the film, presumably agrees with those critics who’ve praised the film by writing such things as: [A] heartfelt answer to the question of where we humans belong- with each other, on this planet, bound by love. (Joe Morgenstern, Wall Street Journal) [A]n impressionistic metaphysical inquiry into mankind's place in the grand scheme of things. (Todd McCarthy, Hollywood Reporter) Most of the positive reviews see the film as wise, as noble, as capturing the human spirit, as struggling in a humble way to define religious spirituality, as honest, and so on. So how does someone who loves this film come to the conclusion that someone who hates this film deserves to die? How does someone who loves this film think it’s a good thing to nudge a fellow human being toward suicide? How does someone who loves this film believe that posting such comments publicly is a positive reflection on the power of this film? What’s so awful about this comment isn’t merely the content of it but the context: For a film that is allegedly so wonderful because it makes you think about life, the universe, and everything, it is patently clear that the commenter has not thought about any of these things at all. It’s outrageously apparent that whatever the commenter believes the power of the film to be (in opposition to what I wrote about the film), the film itself has no power to influence the commenter for the better. By posting such a comment, the commenter negates what s/he says. Or maybe the commenter saw the Mirror Universe Tree of Life. Yes, that must be it. Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus |
posted:
Sat Jul 16 11, 1:29PM categories: Net buzz movie buzz permalink Disqus comments tip jarshare
read morerelated· Roger Ebert hates 3D; is Sacha Baron Cohen worth $20 million?; Brits playing American; and more: leftover links · question of the day: If ‘Variety’ doesn’t see any future in film criticism, is there any hope for it? · celeb news of the week: leaked copy of ‘Super 8’ linked to Howard Stern Show screener · Smurfbargo strangeness · AOL/HuffPo shoots the messenger, fires Moviefone editor Patricia Chui over work-for-free email · wtf: I wasn’t looking for ‘Gandhi’ in ‘Twilight’ -- were you? · wtf: who cares if ‘Toy Story 3’ is 100% Fresh on Rotten Tomatoes? · question of the day: Did you watch Betty White on ‘Saturday Night Live’ this past weekend? · Green Zone (review) · AWFJ announces 2011 awards bloggyprevious post: question of the weekend: What would be the equivalent of L.A.’s Carmageddon where you live? next post: Saturday cute: Giger Alien wedding cake |








