sign of the apocalypse No 1: the threatening Courtney Stodden/Doug Hutchinson reality show

I have been avoiding this whole Courtney Stodden/Doug Hutchinson thing -- and when I say avoiding, I mean “curling into a mental fetal ball and mentally projecting myself into a saner parallel universe as a psychological defense mechanism” -- because it’s so deeply disturbing on a personal level and so indicative of how fucked up everything is on the greater level of our cultural discourse that I can barely wrap my head around it.

But now it has reached a zenith that I can no longer circumvent.

The story so far, in case you have been blessedly unaware:

Actor Doug Hutchinson -- who appeared on TV in Lost and The X-Files, as well as in films including The Green Mile -- married “aspiring country singer” Courtney Stodden this past June. Here is a picture from their wedding:

Doug Hutchinson and Courtney Stodden wedding picture

Here is another one:

Doug Hutchinson and Courtney Stodden wedding picture

Here is a third:

Doug Hutchinson and Courtney Stodden wedding picture

These are creepy enough merely by dint of their ubiquitousness online, considering that basically no one cares who either of them are, but there’s the added creepiness of Stodden’s appearance and posing, which is so calculated and artificial.

The reason this was news, however, is because Hutchinson is 51 years old and Stodden is -- or so we’re told -- 16.

No way she’s 16, right? She’s a sad 35-year-old who thinks she’s still 16, right? Either, way, though, Stodden is the most appalling example yet of the pornified kabuki drag act that supposedly embodies modern femininity. Need more examples?

Courtney Stodden kabuki sexy

(Animated GIF grabbed from Best Week Ever.)

Stodden thinks she’s being sexy. But what she’s really doing is miming what our culture tells us is “sexy” today, and that this is what women are supposed to aspire to. I want to say, “Crap, maybe she really is only 16,” because only a child would buy into that... except plenty of grownup women, particularly those who want to be famous, do the same thing.

Then there’s the matter of Stodden’s Twitter feed, which will certainly make you want to vomit. I don’t mean this in a figurative way: I actually gagged reading some of it. Like this, posted yesterday:

Courtney Stodden tweet

Off to run my productive-fulfilled errands under the humid sky, while nothing but utter sex-appeal slowly drips from my rill curvy-bod. ;-x

Stodden also frequently evokes God in her tweets, thereby marrying the two things that make American culture of the moment sing: fake plastic sex and hypocritical delusions of Jesusitude:

Gratifying our glorious Lord for all of the beauty that He continuously blesses each and every one of us with. Thank you, Jesus! XO's ;-x

She really is a living, breathing cliché of “hotness”:

Experiencing such a wet 'n wild afternoon by turning on a water hose and squirting it all over my heated flesh! Mmm feeling rejuvenated! XOs

This one is particularly disturbing:

Stepping out to run a few errands while rockin' a mini skin-tight blouse, daisy-dukes & sultry stilettos! Love, Your All American Girl XOs!

It’s disturbing because she’s right: She is the embodiment of what an “all-American girl” is supposed to be today.

If someone wanted to spoof a Twitter feed that shared the innermost thoughts of a living Barbie doll, he or she could not do better than this.

And yet, none of this is what shook me out of my self-imposed Hutchinson/Stodden blackout. It was this, which ...ology correctly designates the “creepiest thing ever”:

Fourth worst thing: They brought their dogs on TV with them. Third worst thing: “Fifty-one plus sixteen equals love.” “Sexy love.” Second worst thing: This is from Australian TV, which means the dubious appeal of Hutchinson and Stodden has spread across the planet. Worst thing: Her saying, “It’s gonna be a reality show like no other.”

I don’t want to know what that means. How can reality shows get more reality-showier? This is a prospect that terrifies me. The fact that everything that this girl-woman represents -- and none of it is good or healthy or brings a net positive to the world -- will get more exposure.

And there’s no way to fight it. This will happen. We can ignore it, but that won’t make it go away.

I despair.

support


Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Wed Aug 24 11, 2:31PM

categories:
talent buzz
tv buzz




Disqus comments


tip jar





share


 
 


read more




related


· new DVD releases in Region 2, July 13
· my week at the movies: ‘The Secret Life of Bees,’ ‘Body of Lies,’ ‘Good Dick,’ ‘Eagle Eye,’ ‘RocknRolla,’ ‘Religulous’
· bias update
· question of the weekend: How do we fix what’s wrong with American politics?
· question of the day: What makes a movie star a movie star, and has this changed over the Hollywood century?
· question of the day: What is the most positive, most productive concept for a reality show you can think of?
· wtf: ‘The Hurt Locker,’ for reals
· question of the day: Is there no length to which ‘news’ networks will not go for a ‘story,’ to which audiences will not go for a ‘thrill,’ and to which parents will not go for public attention?
· question of the day: Has reality TV finally reached rockbottom with ‘Reality Hell’?
· question of the day: How could reality TV sink any lower than Fox’s new ‘I Married a Stranger’?


bloggy


previous post:
shocking news: Hollywood hates women, chases them out of TVland

next post:
Doctor Who thing of the day: 1890s steampunk TARDIS

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)