question of the day: Google is guessing at the sexual orientation of celebs -- is this weird?

Via Nerve, we learn something strange:

So, Google has a weird new thing going on: the search engine will now supply (for some people) the best guess as to their sexual orientation before even the top result when you start to search "Is [celebrity]." It's very flattering that the company understands and appreciates one of the top three reasons I use Google, but I find this exceptionally odd. So, Neil Patrick Harris shows up like this:

Google guesses that Neil Patrick Harris is gay

Which is, of course, the correct “guess.” It’s not a guess at all, because Harris is totally out about his orientation.

Nerve writer James Brady Ryan goes on to point out, however, that celebs who are not out but are presumed to be gay -- such as Jodie Foster and Anderson Cooper -- get different treatment: sometimes Google offers a guess, and sometimes it doesn’t. As as one commenter notes, Google doesn’t ever seem to guess anyone is bisexual.

Nerve again:

I understand what Google is doing here — it's simply aggregating the instances a celebrity has talked about their own sexual orientation, analyzing it, and presenting you with the logical conclusion at the top of its search results. The real question is: uh, why, exactly?

Precisely the question. Google isn’t revealing any secrets, it’s just summarizing the conversation about a celebrity. But why suddenly make a special point of summarizing so succinctly about this particular aspect of a person’s life?

Google is guessing at the sexual orientation of celebs -- is this weird?

(If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me. Responses to this QOTD sent by email will be ignored; please post your responses here.)

support


Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Fri Sep 30 11, 9:06AM

categories:
Net buzz
talent buzz
talk amongst yourselves




Disqus comments


tip jar





share


 
 


read more




related


· Jason Statham: Burt Reynolds for the 20teens (and other adventures in social networking)
· probably Avatar would have made eleventy zillion dollars if not for all the downloads (and other adventures in social networking)
· the Internet demands authenticity? (and other adventures in social networking)
· Sam Worthington surprised by ‘Titans’ sequel; book banning makes a comeback in the U.S.; early ‘Siskel & Ebert’ now watchable online; more: leftover links
· Joss Whedon will direct 'Avengers'; much ado about 'Inception' and 'Mad Men'; celebrity stalkers; more: leftover links
· question of the day: Was Universal right to cut the gay joke from its trailer for ‘The Dilemma’?
· question of the day: Who should replace Larry King? Who deserves his or her own high-profile talk show?
· question of the day: What May sweeps twist would you most like to see?
· question of the day: Is the death of Patrick Swayze really the top news of the day?
· A Very Harold and Kumar 3D Christmas (review)


bloggy


previous post:
London photo of the day: the hat factory in Soho

next post:
Courageous (trailer)

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)