question of the day: Is the Internet to blame for the glut of remakes, reboots, and sequels? (John Carpenter says so)

John Carpenter

Director John Carpenter made an, um, interesting observation recently about why we’re being bombarded with unoriginal movies: remakes, reboots, sequels, and other known quantities. From The Independent:

The problem is that all this cable TV, iPad use and social networking has taken attention away from movies, and it's hard to punch through all that clutter. So studios bring back titles that people recognise, because it's such a big risk these days doing something new.

On the surface, it’s the same old excuse we’ve heard before: audiences want something they’re already familiar with; it’s easier to sell something if you’re not starting from a place of zero knowledge; existing stories and characters have built-in fans who are almost guaranteed to come out.

But blaming the Net for this is sort of odd. Yes, there are other entertaining draws on our attention these days. But it seems to me that blamng the Net and social networking is peculiar. If anything, the new peer-to-peer communications options should make marketing new original stories that don’t have ready-made audiences even easier, because it’s far easier to get the word out about them (if they’re good, of course). Sure, it’s tough to bust through the morass of information and get heard, but it’s not impossible.

What do you think? Is the Internet to blame for the glut of remakes, reboots, and sequels? Could the Internet be better harnessed to spread the word of nonfranchise films (and TV)?

(If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me. Responses to this QOTD sent by email will be ignored; please post your responses here.)

support


Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Fri Oct 21 11, 9:54AM

categories:
Net buzz
talent buzz
talk amongst yourselves




Disqus comments


tip jar





share


 
 


read more




related


· question of the day: How much do you take advantage of the cultural opportunities where you live?
· question of the day: What movie event would you be willing to participate in a re-creation of?
· question of the day: How honest must nature documentaries be?
· question of the day: What is so genuinely special about ‘Star Wars,’ ‘Raiders of the Lost Ark,’ and ‘Back to the Future’?
· question of the day: Who is the greatest American director working today?
· journalmalism at its finest: what ‘The Independent’ thinks about its content (and its readers)
· ‘Doctor Who’ thing of the day: Should the next Doctor be a woman?
· ‘Doctor Who’ thing of the day: quiz show gets ‘DW’ answer wrong, but no one knows the actual answer
· ‘Doctor Who’ thing of the day: ‘Doctor Who’ at the Proms was awesome, apparently
· where have all the witty movies gone?


bloggy


previous post:
London photo of the day: construction work at the London Film Festival

next post:
The Descendants (trailer)

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)