question of the day: Would you patronize a cinema that offered “tweet seats”?
Apparently this has been going on for several years now, but I’ve only just heard about it. From USA Today (via All Twitter): A growing number of theaters and performing groups across the country are setting aside "tweet seats," in-house seats for patrons to live-tweet during performances, including the Carolina Ballet in Raleigh, N.C., and the Dayton Opera in Dayton, Ohio. And it’s spreading from the Midwest to the center of theater in the U.S.: Spokespeople for public relations firms Jeffrey Richards Associates, Hartman Group and O&M said the Broadway productions they represent have not used tweet seats. But Jennifer Tepper, the director of promotions for Godspell on Broadway, says the production intends to use them. Can there be any doubt that “tweet seats” are coming to cinemas soon? People are already texting during movies anyway... so this could be a case of “If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.” But why would anyone want to diminish their experience of a performance -- or a movie -- by getting involved in a conversation, even a virtual one, in the middle of it? That seems to be the benefit of tweet seats for some, not a drawback: "Tweeting the CSO's performance was like attending a members-only social event in the midst of a traditionally formal setting," said tweeter Jennifer Nissenbaum, 35, of Dayton. "I could communicate openly about my reactions to the music, musicians and conductor — without speaking a word. Plus, I had the opportunity to engage others, and get their reactions to the performance." If you’re busy digesting other people’s reactions, how do you process your own? You’re no longer digesting the performance, after all. Then again, I’m always astonished at people who can get up in the middle of the movie to use the bathroom or buy more junk food. I don’t like my experience of a film (or a play) interrupted. Why bother going to the theater or the cinema if you’re not going to see in its entirety what you’ve bought a ticket for? Would you patronize a cinema that offered “tweet seats”? Or a stage production, for that matter? (If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me. Responses to this QOTD sent by email will be ignored; please post your responses here.) Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus |
posted:
Wed Dec 07 11, 11:31AM categories: permalink Disqus comments tip jarshare
read morerelated· question of the day: Should we applaud successful movie marketing when the movie being marketed is a stinker? · royal wedding hype; ‘Hanna’s Joe Wright says ‘Sucker Punch’ is sexist; dear god no, there’s gonna be another ‘Tron’ flick; more: leftover links · question of the day: Did you watch any of the Chilean mine rescue, and did you find it riveting? · question of the day: Is network television dead? · question of the day: Has this been the worst summer for movies ever, or does it just feel that way? · question of the day: Has TV simply gone crazy? · question of the day: Do we need film festivals anymore? · question of the day: Did you watch Betty White on ‘Saturday Night Live’ this past weekend? · wtf: this is why the Internet is full of unreadable junk · wtf: Smurfs movie is totally uncalled for bloggyprevious post: London photo of the day: Lord Voldemort really wants that last Smurfs DVD next post: Carnage (trailer) |









