question of the day: What is Hollywood’s problem with Red Tails?

Red Tails

You know, there are days when I just want to give it all up and go live under a rock somewhere. From The Hollywood Reporter:

George Lucas is quite frank about why Hollywood studios turned their backs on his Tuskegee Airmen action film, Red Tails: they didn't want to put money into a film featuring an all-black cast.

Lucas explained Monday on The Daily Show With Jon Stewart, "It's a reasonably expensive movie. Normally black movies, say Tyler Perry movies or something, they're very low budget. Even they won't really release his movies, it goes to one of the lower, not major distributors...And this costs more than what those movies make.

He continued, "They don't believe there's any foreign market for it and that's 60 percent of their profit...I showed it to all of them and they said 'No. We don't know how to market a movie like this.' "

They don’t know how to market a patriotic action movie from George Lucas? Forget the myth of “liberal Hollywood” -- Hollywood is about making money. And this seems like a no-brainer.

According to THR, Lucas:

put $58 million of his own money into the movie and is spending $35 million more for its distribution.

So that’s why it’s getting released at all... which is happening this Friday on 2,500 screens across North America. (There’s no U.K. release date set yet.) And of course it’s a good thing that Lucas is spending his money in this way, supporting a film that he is passionate about and has spent more than two decades shepherding to the big screen. (In case you’re getting ready to rant about how Lucas sucks as a filmmaker lately, know that he’s only producing; the film is written by John Ridley -- who has a story credit on Three Kings and cowrote the script for Steve “Shame” McQueen’s next movie, Twelve Years a Slave -- and Boondocks creator Aaron McGruder; and it’s and directed by TV Anthony Hemingway.)

What is Hollywood’s problem with Red Tails? Is it “merely” racism trumping easy profit? Is it just the typical Hollywood bigotry that keeps anyone who isn’t white and male and straight from dominating the screen? Does it look like something you’d pay to see? (I’m curious to know what my non-American readers think in this regard. Check out the trailer if you haven’t already.) Do you think it will do well? Feel free to guess the weekend box office...

(If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me. Responses to this QOTD sent by email will be ignored; please post your responses here.)

support


Disqus comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

  
posted:
Mon Jan 16 12, 8:00AM

categories:
movie buzz
talent buzz
talk amongst yourselves




Disqus comments


tip jar





share


 
 


read more




related


· how to create a male sex slave, Kevin Smith is fat, ‘FlashForward’s gonna suck, more: leftover links
· Red Tails (trailer)
· what he said: Patrick Goldstein at The Big Picture...
· November 6: DVD alternatives to this weekend’s multiplex offerings
· question of the day: What part of Hollywood would you #Occupy?
· Shame (review)
· a remarkably reasonable statement on ‘Shame’s NC-17 rating
· Shame (trailer)
· AWFJ announces 2011 awards
· fair warning: ‘Expendables’ sequel all but inevitable


bloggy


previous post:
FlickFilosopher.com will join the SOPA protest on Wednesday, January 18

next post:
Moonrise Kingdom (trailer)

search




search FlickFilosopher.com


follow

  
  
  
(in case of site outages or other emergencies, I'll update my status on Twitter and Facebook)



Get our toolbar!

follow FlickFilosopher.com no matter where you are online


share and enjoy

shop to support

support FlickFilosopher.com when you click through here and buy almost anything at:

Amazon U.S.
Amazon Canada
Amazon U.K.
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
Amazon Spain
Amazon Italy
Chapters/Indigo (Canada)