question of the day: Is Internet access a human right?
Does anyone think people are not entitled to access to information, or that access to the Internet is not increasingly a necessary component for participating in the larger culture? British lawyer Rupert Myers doesn’t. From The Telegraph:
Internet access is not a 'human right' – for perverts or anyone else
If Myers had just confined himself to the sex offender, he might have been okay. But then he’s gotta go bringing the rest of humanity into it... and with a blindingly idiotic argument. Perhaps Internet access should not be considered a human right, but if not, he does not make the case. His primary defenses of the notion are 1) Bad people can do bad things with it and 2) Some people don’t take advantage of it. Both of which are ridiculous reasons to deny the right-ness of anything. It’s hard to imagine, say, any American (and probably lots of non-Americans) denying that “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” are fundamental human rights, yet America regularly denies wrongdoers their liberty and sometimes their lives as punishment, and the U.S. has made it a mission in recent decades to make the pursuit of happiness much more difficult than it once was; these do not negate the notion of what makes a right and what doesn’t. In the second case, Myers fails to recognize that at least some of those who don’t use the Internet may want to but don’t know how or don’t have the financial resources to be online regularly.
I’ll let Myers’ fatuous presumption that the Net offers nothing more than shopping, snooping, and -- horror of horrors! -- sharing one’s opinion stand on its own.
I do believe, as you may have guessed, that Internet access should be considered a human right, just as access to a solid education and decent health care should also be considered such, and not just privileges afforded to the lucky or wealthy. How to extend these rights to everyone is a subject for another debate. But deciding that they are rights and not privileges would be a necessary first step before that debate could even happen.
What do you think? Is Internet access a human right? If so, why? If not, why not?
Photo from Dial-a-Grue.
(If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me. Responses to this QOTD sent by email will be ignored; please post your responses here.)
Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus
Wed Nov 14 12, 7:57AM
join the conversation:
talk amongst yourselves
by MaryAnn Johanson
· it was a long four-movie day (and other adventures in social networking)
· question of the weekend: Have you ever seen a UFO?
· question of the day: What films offer the best life lessons to little kids?
· question of the day: Is there too much snark in film criticism today?
· question of the day: Is it unfair to expect actors and other celebs to be role models?
· question of the day: Should film be taught in school the way that literature is?
· question of the day: How much can -- or should -- we gag celebrity press?
· question of the day: Must “great” films be commercial?
· question of the day: What movie would be the most horrifying one to adapt to a stage musical?
· Sherlock: Series 2 arrives on American TV this Sunday night
London photo of the day: and the people did pay homage to a representation of a forest god
21 and Over (trailer)