I agree to the creation of an account at FlickFilosopher.com.
When you log in for the first time via a social-media account, this site collects your email address to automatically create an account for you here. Once your account is created, you’ll be logged in to this account.
disagreeagree
connect withD
I agree to the creation of an account at FlickFilosopher.com.
When you log in for the first time via a social-media account, this site collects your email address to automatically create an account for you here. Once your account is created, you’ll be logged in to this account.
disagreeagree
please login to comment
4 Comments
oldest
newestmost voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Sarah
Mon, Jun 21, 2010 11:11pm
The person who did the crepe jumpsuit, wide belt, and cantilever heel was fairly prescient. I wouldn’t necessarily stare if I saw that in Manhattan.
Matt C
Mon, Jun 21, 2010 11:19pm
I haven’t laughed so much at a 1930s product since “Reefer Madness.”
Mo
Tue, Jun 22, 2010 1:09am
I love how the more futuristic something is, the more it reflects the time it came from.
But leaving the air conditioning out of it, the jumpsuit and the dress right after it (*swish*) are very close to current or recent red carpet trends. (Doesn’t Posh have a set of heels like that?) Two out of that few isn’t a bad success rate.
The person who did the crepe jumpsuit, wide belt, and cantilever heel was fairly prescient. I wouldn’t necessarily stare if I saw that in Manhattan.
I haven’t laughed so much at a 1930s product since “Reefer Madness.”
I love how the more futuristic something is, the more it reflects the time it came from.
But leaving the air conditioning out of it, the jumpsuit and the dress right after it (*swish*) are very close to current or recent red carpet trends. (Doesn’t Posh have a set of heels like that?) Two out of that few isn’t a bad success rate.
“Oh, swish!”
“Candy for cuties!”
The “future” looks bleak.