your £$ support needed

part of a small rebellion | by maryann johanson

Men, Women & Children movie review (London Film Festival)

Men Women & Children red light

Jason Reitman is way too young to have produced a work of such fuddy-duddy handwringing over These Kids (And Adults) Today and how we play with our e-toys.
I’m “biast” (pro): nothing

I’m “biast” (con): nothing

I have not read the source material

(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

As the little explorer probe Voyager passes into interstellar space to begin its long lonely journey to who knows where, Adam Sandler is masturbating to Internet porn.

There’s a point to this juxtaposition, but only director Jason Reitman knows what it is. (Presumably Chad Kultgen, author of the novel this is based on, knows, too, but there’s no evidence of that here.) Is it that the hyperadvanced and superwise aliens who may one day find Voyager will be disappointed if they could know (which they won’t be able to know) that all we ended up doing with our technology after we launched that probe is fart around on Facebook? Is it that we’re squandering our time on our little plot of beautiful habitable planet, unique in the all the universe for all we know, by looking down at our screens instead of up at nature? Who can say? But kids are spending too much time playing videogames and texting their friends, that’s for certain!

Reitman (Labor Day, Up in the Air) is, frankly, way too young to have produced a work of such fuddy-duddy handwringing over These Kids (And Adults) Today and how we play with our e-toys. The wonderful ensemble cast — Jennifer Garner (Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day, Dallas Buyers Club), Rosemarie DeWitt (Touchy Feely, Promised Land), Judy Greer (Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, Carrie), Dennis Haysbert (Sin City: A Dame to Kill For, Mr. Peabody & Sherman), J.K. Simmons (Labor Day, True Grit), to name but a few; even Sandler (Blended, Grown Ups 2) is fine here — struggles to bring some genuine human emotion to overwrought scenarios that explore banal realities of human nature that are not actually things new to the era of texting and cheating-on-your-spouse hookup Web sites (parents can have trouble letting their children grow up; constant contact does not equate to authentic communication; sometimes it’s easier to talk to strangers than the people who know us well) while ignoring all the good that the Internet has brought. Not one character here has an ultimately positive experience online or with a screen, which is a dismally unfair representation of our newly interconnected culture.

And we keep returning to Voyager and its look back, from the edge of our solar system, at the pale blue dot that is planet Earth; the metaphor remains both strained and mysterious, in spite of the efforts of the kindly omniscient narrator (the voice of Emma Thompson [The Love Punch, Saving Mr. Banks], who does not appear otherwise) to enlighten us. Surely the insanity of Texas high-school football, the tragedy of anorexia, the mindlessness of hanging out at the mall, and teenaged girls who post photos of themselves in their underwear — all included in the film’s handwringing — are also part of the astonishing multifarious miracle of human life on this mote of a pretty planet, no?

viewed during the 58th BFI London Film Festival

Please support truly independent film criticism
as generously as you can.
support my work at PayPal support my work at Patreon support my work at Ko-Fi support my work at Liberapay More details...

Men, Women & Children (2014)
US/Can release: Oct 03 2014
UK/Ire release: Dec 05 2014

MPAA: rated R for strong sexual content including graphic dialogue throughout-some involving teens, and for language
BBFC: rated 15 (strong sex references, strong language)

viewed at a private screening with an audience of critics

official site | IMDb
more reviews: Movie Review Query Engine | Rotten Tomatoes

If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.

  • RogerBW

    Appending “on the internet” to a description of behaviour doesn’t change it into a different behaviour. But clearly lots of people still think it does.

  • True. People readily excuse the most appalling behavior online that they would never tolerate IRL. For example.

  • Tonio Kruger

    But he’s right. No one ever complained about not being able to understand the younger generation before this danged old Internet was invented. :-)

    I mean, next some guy will write a novel about some other guy who spends too much time reading books.

    But seriously, folks…

    There’s been so much hype about new technology and how it’s going to do this, that and the other thing that there was bound to be a pushback. And anyone old enough to remember similar hype about music videos, VCRs, and CDs can’t help but be a little skeptical at times.

    And can’t Reitman’s most famous film — Up in the Air — be described as a negative portrayal of the way new technology impacts people’s lives?

  • *Up in the Air* is a *much* better exploration of, very broadly speaking, some similar themes.

  • rick

    Having seen the movie at a preview, I agree with MaryAnn’s comment that “Not one character here has an ultimately positive experience online or with a screen.” I would take that comment further and say that “Not one character here has an ounce of intelligence.” They are all good actors, but they’re playing a bunch of one-dimensional characters, most of whom have the IQ of a block of cement. And their one-dimensionality gets forced onto us incessantly throughout. An interesting idea for a film, but completely lacking in nuances or subtlety. Reitman should have found a better writer.

Pin It on Pinterest