
BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: -20
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: 0
[no significant representation of women in authority]
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: 0
[no issues]
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -5
WILDCARD SCORE: +5
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
TOTAL SCORE: -20
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: Even a movie that is supposedly “for women” is still all about men. While there is a healthy mix of the wide variety of women we see in the real world — young and old, fat and skinny, beautiful and plain, and everything in between — in the crowd scenes here, the few female actors with any speaking lines are not significant characters, and are present only to serve the men’s stories.
Click here for the ongoing ranking of 2015’s films for female representation.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of Magic Mike XXL! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of Magic Mike XXL.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This rating is brought to you without paywall restrictions by my generous Kickstarter supporters. If you missed out on the Kickstarter and would like to support this project, you may:
• become a monthly or yearly subscriber of FlickFilospher.com
• make a pledge at Patreon
• make a donation via Paypal



















Nothing unusual about finding Andie MacDowell sexy. Or at least there shouldn’t be. :-)