If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll measure. If you’re not a spammer or a troll, your comment will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately.
subscribe
notify of
3 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
bronxbee
bronxbee
Wed, Sep 30, 2015 2:34am

yup — yet another male critic explaining why women’s lives, and interests don’t matter — and why the only important relationship is one with a *man*.

Tonio Kruger
reply to  bronxbee
Tue, Oct 27, 2015 3:47am

Er, perhaps I’m missing something but that does not appear to be what he’s saying in the original article.

After all, he does not appear to be arguing in favor of making fewer movies about women. Instead he argues in favor of making better movies about women.

And the problem with that stance is what exactly?

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Tonio Kruger
Tue, Oct 27, 2015 11:09am

When many women — critics and ordinary moviegoers — are saying that this movie does a really good job of representing women’s lives and friendships, it is mansplaining for a man to tell us that we’re wrong about that.

He also complains that the men’s roles aren’t big enough, but the film is NOT about the men, or about the marriages. And still those “thankless” roles are bigger and more robust that wives onscreen are usually allowed, even when movies *are* about marriages.