I’m “biast” (con): love the original film
I have not read the source material
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
Why remake a beloved classic film? This new version of Whisky Galore!, a listless cover of the delightful 1949 Ealing comedy, hasn’t found a good reason. It doesn’t even seem to have bothered to look for one.
On a small remote Scottish island, the whisky has just run out… and since it’s 1943 and there’s a war on, there’s little chance of replenishment. Until a cargo ship carrying tens of thousands of cases of the amber-colored water of life grounds itself nearby, and the temptation to just haul it away becomes too great for the islanders to resist. The cast is reliably charming, but the islanders are little more than twee caricatures: the pretty and plucky sisters (Naomi Battrick and Ellie Kendrick [The Levelling]), their insipid fiancés (Sean Biggerstaff [Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets] and Kevin Guthrie [Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them]), the sourpuss schoolmarm (Annie Louise Ross: Trainspotting), the dour postmaster (Gregor Fisher: Wild Target), the grumpy doctor (John Sessions: Denial), etc, etc. And Eddie Izzard (The Lego Batman Movie) seems to be reigning himself waaaay in as the posh army captain the townspeople are all doing an end-run around, which is a real shame.
In 1949, a light comedy about a humorous wartime deprivation must have felt like a relief, like a long-held breath of anxiety and fear letting itself go. And the film’s jocular tweaking of an upper-class authority figure must have felt both transgressive and like a sneaky embrace of the collapse of social and cultural mores in the wake of the war and in the early years of their restructuring. Obviously, there is plenty of room in such a story for a new resonance for today’s upended world to emerge, but that never happens. Worse, this new movie manages to be entirely unfunny. If it can’t make us laugh and doesn’t want to make us think, what is the point of it?