Love Is Thicker Than Water movie review: so, love is a sludge, then?

Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

Love Is Thicker Than Water red light

MaryAnn’s quick take…

This would-be modern Romeo-and-Juliet tale is little more than a pile-on of class stereotypes, contrived dialogue, and one whopper of a coincidence.tweet
I’m “biast” (pro): nothing
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

Arthur (Johnny Flynn) hails from a family of miners in Wales, and now works as a bike messenger in London. Vida (Lydia Wilson: Star Trek Beyond) is a cellist who makes no money from her music, but that’s okay because her rich parents have bought her an amazing apartment in trendy East London. Now, Johnny is moving into that flat with Vida, and the two families are about to culture-clash.

From the directing team of Emily Harris and Ate de Jong (he’s best known for the 1991 cult film Drop Dead Fred), Love Is Thicker Than Water wants to be a modern Romeo-and-Juliet tale. But what starts out as a study in contrasts between two very different families becomes pile-on of unkind stereotypes: her wealthy family is snooty; his working class family is vulgar. That her family is Jewish and his is not is a red herring, though the movie doesn’t see this. Worse, that ginned-up conflict seems to be a way to avoid the real story of the fundamental problem at the root of Vida and Arthur’s relationship: they’re both on the wrong professional tracks, and that’s a far bigger stumbling block to their happiness, separately and together, than their difficult families are. The film takes far too long to even recognize this in its central characters, let alone address it, and then does so only fleetingly, and mostly offscreen.

Love may be thicker than water, but is it thicker than booze?
Love may be thicker than water, but is it thicker than booze?

Instead, the script, by de Jong, turns on a whopper of a coincidence, and indulges in a lot of contrived dialogue that doesn’t sound anything like how real people talk — sample: “There’s a silence in you. It frightens me.” The movie gets lost, too, in trying to create what is meant to be a sense of intense intimacy between Arthur and Vida: it comes across as isolation. They appear to have no friends but each other, and the film ends up feeling claustrophobic.

The cast — which also features legends Juliet Stevenson (The Letters) and Henry Goodman (Their Finest) as Vida’s parents, and up-and-comer Ellie Kendrick (The Levelling) as her sister — is terrific. But none of them are well served by what is ultimately a shaggy-dog romance.

share and enjoy
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
notify of
1 Comment
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Tue, Dec 05, 2017 2:31pm

I THINK the U.S. is getting fewer of these movies–we now have The Hallmark Channel to pump out gallons of this sludge.
The Wolf, man.