We’re so used to our historical figures, our Great Men, requiring a bit of grading-on-a-curve. “Oh, we must forgive So-and-So for that aspect of his life and work, times were different then.” “No, we must not judge Whatshisname by today’s understanding of morality, that’s simply the way things were back in the day.” And yet we still continue to celebrate them and insist upon their importance and mythologize their words and deeds.
Meanwhile, one of the great true heroes of American history — someone who needs no justifying or qualifying — has been all but ignored by pop culture, and hence all but left out of the collective American imagination. Perhaps because what she fought for is a grand cause — the physical and existential battle for autonomy, agency, and basic humanity of African-Americans — that is not yet fully won. Perhaps the fact that everything that Harriet Tubman stood for and continues to symbolize still resonates on so many levels today is — for some, for our cultural gatekeepers — too harsh a reminder that the ugly past is not yet past. (All the more reason to honor her and remember her, you’d think. The inspiration she offers continues to be very necessary.)

Or perhaps it’s “merely” because she was a woman. And black. Perhaps that’s enough — for some — to pretend her story and her legacy don’t really matter. For if we — the big We — were to acknowledge her as a Great Woman, where would it stop? What if there were other Great Women who also must be acknowledged? Why, the White Man might lose his “rightful” central role in the American saga!
Anyway, you’d have thought that Hollywood, at least, mightn’t have taken so damn long to see that Tubman’s undeniable, irrefutable heroics are, if nothing else, excellent fodder for big-screen entertainment. Tubman was badass by any measure, but certainly by the action-adventure one: She rescued herself from slavery in 1850s Maryland with a treacherous journey north! She risked her liberty and her very life sneaking back into the South to bring others to freedom! She worked as a gol-durned spy for the Union Army during the Civil War! This is the stuff of bold, visual storytelling.
And it’s all here because now, finally!, director and cowriter (with Gregory Allen Howard) Kasi Lemmons (Talk to Me) has blessed us with the Tubman origin story. “Origin story” is just the right sort of cinematic introduction Tubman needs to slide her into the epic American narrative. Harriet is solid, conventional filmmaking with a broad sweep, a big-picture overview (no pun intended) that finds a deeply satisfying balance among the contradictory currents of Tubman’s life. The film does not deny the horrific facts of slavery, but this is primarily an entertaining movie-movie experience, one that succeeds in acknowledging Tubman as a vulnerable, flawed human woman while also embracing her towering legend and the profound power of what she symbolizes.
As Tubman, Cynthia Erivo (Bad Times at the El Royale, Widows) is an immense presence, deeply engaging and incredibly empathetic; the Broadway musical star even gets to do a bit of singing onscreen. Lemmons and Erivo handle Tubman’s “superpower” — she thought God spoke to her in a very practical way, literally guiding her in her dangerous work to avoid capture — with a smart plausible deniability that allows for whatever interpretation feels best to you. If you want to accept the supernatural, that works, but if, like me, it feels more right to see her seeming precognition as simply sharp instinct and insight, well, that works too.

Harriet is a movie of an undeniable mainstream appeal — this is no stodgy costume drama or dry history lesson. But it also does rectify what may be some misunderstandings about the era. There are no white saviors here: Harriet centers black Americans in the antislavery movement, and on the underground railroad that helped slaves escape, which is how it was. It accurately depicts some black Americans as relatively wealthy and in positions of some authority, at least among other black people, such as Janelle Monáe (Welcome to Marwen, Hidden Figures) as the proprietor of the boarding house that becomes Tubman’s first home as a free woman.
That mainstream appeal is so very necessary, and not only to put a confused record straight. I recently met an American — and not a young person in whom such ignorance might not be unexpected — who had never before heard of Harriet Tubman until this movie crossed her radar. This is criminal… and as is the way of origin stories, we can hope that Harriet is just the beginning of the tales we tell about her, to begin to smash our pop-cultural ignorance. My one complaint about the film: not enough spy stuff! There could be a whole movie about just her career as a spy in the Civil War. We — movie lovers and proud Americans alike — absolutely need that sequel.
viewed during the 63rd BFI London Film Festival
I recently attended an all-night teach-in at the Brooklyn Public Library on the legacy of American slavery and the continuing fight for racial justice. At the opening ceremony, Aisha Hinds, who played Tubman on the show Underground, gave a reading as Tubman exhorting her listeners to get off the comfortable sidelines and join the fight. Her words electrified the crowd and it was without question one of the most powerful communal moments I’ve witnessed. I think it’s safe to say that everyone in that audience knew who Harriet Tubman was and what a foundational figure she is in American history. It’s indeed a criminal failure of our education system that not everyone knows who she is. Yet.
(As far as Harriet-as-action-hero goes: One of the best parts of Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter was when she showed up to lead the Underground Railroad — which was an army of ex-enslaved people armed with silver — against the vampires. Sadly it was a bit part, and was apparently the only other time she’s been on the big screen. I’m looking forward to this film finally showing her confronting REAL evil.)
That’s it, though: Everyone who knows who Tubman is, and why she was/is so important, has learned about her through their own self-education. Somehow we (Americans, I mean) all “know” about George Washington and the cherry tree, and his wooden teeth, and all the other shit that probably isn’t even true. Tubman should be like that, so baked into the American mythology that you don’t even know where the truth ends in stories of her exploits.
Well, I learned about her in public school. And this despite getting the bulk of my public school education in the South.
And much of what we “know” about George Washington and similar figures comes not so much from public education but from popular culture. Granted, it can be a very confusing type of education — imagine being a recent immigrant who got all of his or her information about Abraham Lincoln from old Bugs Bunny cartoons — but it exists nevertheless.
Bugs Bunny is how I first learned about Teddy Roosevelt. :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9w5uW8O_JSg&t=80s
That’s my point.
If the stills you’ve chosen are any indication, this movie is gorgeously lit (in addition to, you know, everything else). I ponder sometimes what a difference better, smarter approaches to lighting actors of color has made in the stories we get to see. Needless to say I cannot *wait* to see this film!
Erivo is going to play Aretha Franklin too. Holyjesusgod yes.
Good interview below. Singing starts at 5:18.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfbCccXCpuo
“That’s like staring at the sun.” Indeed it is.
And an interview about the Harriet Tubman movie turned into a discussion about Seth Mnuchin’s policies. That’s how we know it’s 2019.
It’s wonderful to see this movie come out – celebrating a real hero
These are the people we should have on our currency – I can’t believe that monster Andrew Jackson is still being kept on the $20
The fact that there’s even a question about it makes me think Griffith’s Birth of a Nation is still central to US culture – buried and repressed, but still an accurate snapshot of American psychosis – like our Dorian Grey portrait locked away
It’s moving that it should be Kasi Lemmons who brings this film to life – a veteran of the nearly forgotten Black New Wave of the 90s – I really hope this film takes off
Another film from that time that depicts similar heroism is Nightjohn, from Charles Burnett – also one of the most beautiful films I’ve seen about the value of reading
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_cSUPXo_30
Not that repressed at all, actually.
Check out all the essays and podcasts of The 1619 Project if you haven’t yet.
Thanks for the link – looks like a great resource
What I mean by repressed – we look at a lot of this historically – it’s good that we’re focusing more on this
But I think people are still afraid to consider how much this horrific racism is still very much a part of who we are today
The South and poor white “trash” have been endlessly scapegoated by affluent liberals who believe they’ve transcended this heritage – the open racism is rightfully condemned, but it’s just the visible tip of the iceberg
Get Out smacked us right in the face with it – Blumhouse deserves credit for green-lighting such an uncompromising film – but an even greater sign was the huge commercial success – widespread audiences were ready to listen
WHITE people. Black and brown people have known all along.
It’s more pervasive than that – racism is a virus and it’s frightening how many different ways people can be infected
Spike Lee’s second film, School Daze, goes deeper into the intricacies of racial politics across a range of communities
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4nhRQfUk68
Really? You’re following up “I saw Get Out, so I know all about racism” with “And I saw a Spike Lee movie thirty years ago”?
? I have no idea what this comment means, or how it even relates to what I posted – did you even watch the clip?
If you have an actual disagreement with something I posted, and have actual reasons for disagreeing, I’d be curious to know what your own thoughts might be –
To be honest, my first reaction to your remark was to think it was just some troll – but your responses are usually much more constructive than this
Colorism IS an issue in POC communities, but it exists because of internalized white supremacy, since lighter-skinned people were treated better by white power structures ever since slavery (and Western colonialism/imperialism worldwide). It is something that POC communities will have to grapple with, but at the ROOT of it is anti-black/brown racism from the dominant white culture. Black/brown communities have never forgotten it. Only white communities have had the luxury of pretending they’ve gotten past it.
i’m very anxious to see this movie, as i had a slight obsession about Harriet Tubman when i was around 11 or 12 and read every biography i could get my hands on (also, Annie Oakley, Helen Keller, and Emily Dunning Barringer)… there have been movies about all the others, and i’m very happy Harriet Tubman is finally getting her due. i don’t understand how she isn’t well known. i’m not sure how people become well known… i mean i’m not sure how i heard about her… did i just pick up a book in the biography section one day at the school library? how have other people heard about the biographies that interest them?
I read a comic book about Harriet Tubman when I was little. I think my parents bought the entire series of black history comics, but that was probably my favorite.
For a number of years, after I moved to New York, I helped run a storytelling series at the Harriet Tubman statue. Almost every storyteller had a story to tell about her, and all of them were different.
I don’t remember how I first learned about Tubman, but I’m almost certain it wasn’t in school. It might have been in something like *Cricket* magazine, which I had a sub to as a kid, or maybe just through my voracious book reading.
Just saw this, and loved it SO much. Spot-on review. And every scene in that montage of rescues should be made into its own movie, stat.
I think this is exactly right. We can gloss over the fact that Washington owned slaves and glorify him as a war hero and as the first president. We can popularize “Honest Abe” Lincoln by celebrating how he “saved the Union” and “ended” slavery, without looking too closely at that centuries-long history of brutality. Even those who celebrate Robert E. Lee can claim they’re just honoring him as a military leader, and write glowing bios of him without a single mention of slavery, the thing he was fighting to preserve. (How many brilliant Nazi generals are commemorated in Germany, I wonder?) But to popularize and “folklorize” Harriet Tubman’s story is necessarily to confront, head-on, the ground-level details of slavery, and to wrestle with how so many Americans’ ancestors (in both the North and South) were complicit in that evil, and how so many of us are complicit today in upholding and benefiting from its legacy. That’s something that many Americans are still unwilling to recognize (see the conservative freakout over the 1619 Project as just one recent example).