
I’m “biast” (con): not a fan of most movies labeled “horror”
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
First of all: No. No. Why, dude — suddenly single dad to traumatized young children — would you leave said shocked and distressed kids with your *checks notes* new fiancée who is also *checks notes* the sole survivor of her own massive childhood trauma, which you, dude — as her *checks notes again* fucking therapist — should know has left her incredibly vulnerable and perhaps not fit to watch over anyone’s children, never mind your own?
*extremely pinches nose in exasperation and despair*
I can’t. I just cannot with this movie. The Lodge purports to be the latest thing in horror, or something, but, well, they said the same about Midsommar last year and Hereditary the year before (and sure, probably, if you loved Midsommar and Hereditary and they didn’t register with you as deeply problematic, you might find this one creepy too; anyway, this isn’t from Ari Aster, if that matters). But: no.

If I thought The Lodge was supposed to be a condemnation of men’s utter idiocy, especially as fathers, maybe I could get behind it. Worse, though, I think that maybe it is intended as such, but, wow… Again, I reiterate: Hell. To. The. No.
(I mean, look: I’m a ragey feminist who is looking for reasons to hate on men — if it makes you feel better to think that — and I still cannot get behind this stupid-but-thinks-it’s-smart movie.)
Okay, so, Richard Armitage (Ocean’s Eight, Pilgrimage) — whom I adore and, perhaps smartly, he barely appears here — leaves his kids (Jaeden Martell [Knives Out, It: Chapter Two] and Lia McHugh) with his intended (Riley Keough: Logan Lucky, It Comes at Night), whom the children barely know but definitely resent, in a remote mountain lodge in the run-up to Christmas. As a way for everyone to get to know one another. He has to work but will join them later. Seriously, fuck this guy, which is an attitude that the movie doesn’t share, much less recognize. And still the setup feels so obnoxious, so positively guaranteed to end in disaster that you’d be forgiven for thinking that the movie is deliberately trolling us.
And, indeed, it doesn’t go very well, for obvious down-to-earth reasons. And then it turns worse, for reasons that could be supernatural, or maybe not, but probably the latter because there really isn’t any other explanation, and yet which are in either case completely banal, offering no insight into anything: not the human condition, not love in all its many iterations, not even passive-aggressive biological attachment. But yet also only in a way that, if there’s any explanation for it at all, demonizes mental illness, and demonizes coping mechanisms in response to suffering and grief, or–

Even as I am so down on this damn movie, I still might be giving too much credit to it. It’s entirely plausible that writers (with Sergio Casci) and directors Severin Fiala and Veronika Franz honestly believed they were exploring what it means to suffer, to be haunted, to not understand what is real and what is fantasy because of how you have been raised. Like: Religion! But I can say as a diehard atheist: Also nope. Or, like, the warpingness of parenthood, or the warpingness that comes as a child with trusting too much in adults. Also no. (Fiala and Franz’s previous feature, the German-language Goodnight Mommy, about the abuse of trust that parents can engage in, is also a big ol’ no from me.) The absolute mishmash of psychological motivations ostensibly at work here is an infuriating blend of, well, a whole lotta nothing, really. This is a miserable movie that wants to have its ambiguous cake and eat it, too, smothered in a gloomy frosting of oppressively grim, gray, and claustrophobic visual design.
There’s a another older movie that I wanna say that the limp, obvious The Lodge made me think of, but to name it would be a spoiler for this movie. Except sort of not, either. Because where that other movie works on multiple levels, whether you want to see it as concretely “factual” (at least as far as its otherworldly elements can take that) or merely metaphorical, this one doesn’t work on any of the levels you might stretch to grant to it.
Basically, fuck these movies that you cannot even talk about, even to say, Just don’t waste your time with it, because all they have going for them is a vague “please don’t spoil” vibe.


















AAAARRRrrgggghhhhh
SPOILER TAGS DON’T WORK IN THE COMMENTS PAGE!!!!
PLEASE
LET
THIS
DO
THE
JOB
OF
ROLLING
THEM
OFF
THE
LINES
Turn of The Screw? The Innocents? You can’t mean The Others, no?
Um…
So…
Yeah…
[edited to add more lines to avoiding spoiling on the recent-comments page]
(Is this enough lines?)
(Maybe not.)
(Here’s some more…)
It’s The Others.
But also not really, Or only in a way that the movie would like to think you might make that comparison.
Look: So many other critics seem to love this movie that even though I know *for a fact* that some critics are influenced by peer pressure, I do wonder if (gaslighting myself!) I’m missing something here. I don’t think I am. I am confident in my opinion. But I would be very curious to hear what you think if you ever see this one.
[Yours didn’t have enough lines in it to not show up on the comments preview page…]
I haven’t read any other reviews. I’m not sure I’ve even seen a trailer for this movie. If I do end up seeing it, I promise to come back here and comment, but, in general, I don’t go for suspense or horror films. I have enough anxieties in my day-to-day life these days that I don’t like paying for them. Still, I might take a look.
It sounds pretty ridiculous given the premise.
Aw shit. I’ll add some more.
I suspect you needn’t bother with this one. The Invisible Man, on the other hand… defo. (Review asap.)
What about Promising Young Woman?
Haven’t seen it yet but looking forward to it.
Thanks, I’ll consider that one. The trailer gave me agita, though.
FWIW: I liked Goodnight Mommy a whole lot…although I could have done without the (SPOILER) unnecessary Shyamalan twist ending (which I’m putting in spoiler tags because it changes the viewing experience if you’re waiting for the twist). But, strangely, I have no desire to see The Lodge. The handful of reviews I’ve read were fairly negative, and the descriptions of the plot made it sound like an excellent film choice for Someone Who Is Not Me.
Yeah there was just too much utter stupidity in the plot, like you pointed out. The dad and husband to be was supposed to be a psychiatrist yet he makes as many bad decisions as some teens in a cheap slasher flick.
My wife and I had wanted to see it but it never went wide in our area. The closest theater playing it was an hour away and we decided it wasn’t worth it. I’ll ck it out later on streaming.
Just saw this one on On Demand, MaryAnn. Completely agree with your review. I was far more intrigued and entertained with what you wrote reviewing this ridiculousness than what I just watched for the last hour forty or however long.
I’ve seen plenty of “very much atmosphere, very little else” and although I usually find those to be boring slogs the majority of the time, I sensed the folks behind this one felt that the story here was compelling and the decisions logical, even in a willing suspension of disbelief world called movies.
This was stark, minimalist and atmospheric. Fine. But this also felt like really bad community theater thinking it was thought provoking literature to me, from very early on in the film, really. A great big whiff on any level, I say.
Next time, if given the option of attending one of those cult-ish sweat lodge type of weekend excursions or seeing a dreary, “Okay, how is the obligatory impending doom gonna play out after seemingly bright characters make such stupid choices?” movie such as this one, I’ll take my chances with the former.