Onward movie review: the Pixar road goes ever on

MaryAnn’s quick take: Don’t let the Pixar curve throw you: familiar this quest may be, but it’s full of magic and wonder and humor and melancholy, and set in a fully realized fantasy world. Not a masterpiece but very good.
I’m “biast” (pro): big ol’ fantasy geek; love Pixar
I’m “biast” (con): another boy with daddy issues? oy
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
Get new reviews via email or app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or paid Patreon patron.

Damn Pixar, anyway. What am I supposed to say here? “Wow, Pixar has done it again!”? *pfft* “More magic and wonder and humor and melancholy from Pixar!”? *yawn* “Hooray for enthralling fully realized fantasy world!”? Pixar keeps hitting it out of the park, and I’m running out of different ways to say the same thing over and over again. (Pixar disappointments? The bland yet also confused The Good Dinosaur, and the Cars series; merely thinking about its fantasy world sends me into a paroxysm of the existential heebie-jeebies. And… that’s it. Everything else Pixar has touched has been varying degrees of lovely.)

The way to do it is to praise with faint damns, maybe. Onward is not another Inside Out, perhaps one of the most audacious, most insightful, most perfect movies ever made, by anyone. It ain’t Ratatouille, with its profound and impossibly touching tale of the necessity of pursuing one’s passion and dedicating oneself to excellence. If we’re gonna grade on a Pixar curve, very few movies would ever measure up. And Onward doesn’t. It’s not a masterpiece. It’s only very good.

Onward
I’ve heard of absent fathers, but this is ridiculous…

Unlike in waaaay too many Disney movies, the protagonist, 16-year-old elf Ian Lightfoot (the voice of Tom Holland: Avengers: Endgame, The Current War), did not lose his mother as a small child; it’s his father who has died, before Ian was even born. His mom, Laurel (the voice of Julia Louis-Dreyfus: Planes, Animal Farm), is still around as a loving, supportive figure… and she also gets to be a badass mom hero as she supports Ian’s journey! But wait. I’m looking for faint damns. Here’s one: There’s still nothing terribly original in the teenage-boy-with-daddy-issues angst that fuels the plot. We get this regularly onscreen, and in so many of the stories we tell in every medium.

The setting is absolutely delightful, though, and unlike any I’ve ever seen before: a gorgeous, funny world much like our own, a society of smartphones and gas-station convenience stores and heritage being bulldozed in the name of progress. Except that heritage is one full of wizardry and daring quests and numerous sentient races — elves and orcs and pixies and centaurs and so on — living together in relative harmony. The fictional clichés of our Dungeons & Dragons and The Lord of the Rings are the literal history of the people of Onward, and they continued developing their civilization from medieval-esque levels of technology to what we would call modern information-era stuff. There are tons of blink-and-you-miss-’em visual jokes and flourishes in the clever animation — pulled off with lively, buoyant verve — that considers how these two usually divergent cultural modes might meld, and I’m sure I did indeed miss plenty of them. It’ll be fun to watch this again eventually and do a ton of freeze-framing.

Onward
That feeling when you’ve tamed your inner beast in order to make it in restaurant management.

And here’s the really interesting thing about this world, a notion that I cannot recall coming across even in my fairly extensive genre reading: these people put aside magic in favor of technology, because magic requires skill and talent that is rare while the fruits of technology are readily available to everyone. Because that’s democratic. Because that’s fair. There’s an underlying egalitarianism in this world that is cheering, especially right now.

Ah, but what’s going to happen now that Ian discovers that he has that rare skill and talent for magic, when he receives an antique wizard’s staff his father left for him, and also for his older brother, Barley (the voice of Chris Pratt: The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part, Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom), although Barley is unable to activate it? Will Ian eventually bring magic back into the world and knock everything out of balance? That’s something for a sequel to explore, perhaps. Onward is merely concerned with how Ian and Barley can fix a spell gone wrong… a spell their father, an accountant who dabbled in magic, left behind that would allow the boys to spend a day with his briefly resurrected self. (Shades of A.I. and those far-future aliens bringing Mommy back for a day? So there ya go: that’s not terribly original either, is it?)

Onward
Badass pixie Dewdrop is my new Patronus.

So Ian and Barley go on an old-style quest to find the macguffin gem they need to fix the broken spell. Which Barley knows all about, because he’s a history nut… though to our eye he looks like a heavy-metal D&D nut. Which means there’s something wonderfully ticklish in how screenwriters Jason Headley (his feature debut), Keith Bunin, and Pixar veteran — and also director here — Dan Scanlon (Monsters University) play with how clichés of adolescent malehood are coded in our culture. Barley is a completely different sort of nerd than we’re used to.

Ian? He’s a pretty familiar awkward teen: nervous, uncertain, shy, clumsy. His personal quest will be all about finding the magic in himself — sometimes mostly figuratively — while inspiring others around him to do the same. Such as the hilarious tough but tiny biker pixies led by bruiser-chick Dewdrop (the voice of Grey Griffin: Bumblebee) whom the boys encounter and accidentally anger on their quest, and the Manticore (the voice of Octavia Spencer: Ma, Luce), part lion, part scorpion, who is roused out of her suburban-businesswoman mode into rediscovering her inner monster in order to give them some vital assistance along the way.

I mean, yeah: There’s magic here, of all kinds. Not much of it is completely unexpected or unusual. Much charming. Very Pixar. Whatev.

share and enjoy
               
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
10 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
MarkyD
Mon, Mar 09, 2020 2:41pm

Something about this movie from the very first trailer has been offputting. I normally love Pixar movies and have seen most of them in the theater, but this one I am totally ‘Meh” on. The weird-looking blue people? The pants? Chris Pratts association? Not sure. Apparently I’m not alone, though since it opened pretty low for a Pixar movie.
I’m a total fantasy/sci-fi geek so this should be up my alley, but I can’t force myself to be interested. I’ll eventually stream it some day.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  MarkyD
Mon, Mar 23, 2020 11:08am

It opened low because of the pandemic.

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Mon, Mar 23, 2020 12:20pm

Like other recent movies, it’s being released soon as a streaming video, so people who hate movie theatres can watch it from home or outdoors on their phone, as long as they keep six feet away from other people.

https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/20/21188037/disney-onward-digital-platforms-plus-date-early-release-coronavirus

Tonio Kruger
Tonio Kruger
Thu, Mar 12, 2020 1:19am

Being a Pixar fan myself, I wish I could disagree with MarkyD here but er… No!

The first time I saw the trailer for this flick, I had a hard time believing it was for a Pixar project and yes, “Meh” does sum up my general reaction to it.

I’d like to hope that I’ll be proved wrong by the actual movie but I’m not holding my breath. Which is just as well since I can think of more than a few projects — the upcoming Wonder Woman movie, for example — that generate a lot more enthusiasm in my inner movie-goer.

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  Tonio Kruger
Thu, Mar 12, 2020 11:24pm

I’m a huge animation fan, and I end up buying the “making of” book for almost every Disney and Pixar movie, even when the film is sort of mediocre, because the production drawings are so spectacular.

When I saw the trailer for Onward, I thought, “This time, I might not need to buy the book.” The character designs looked uninspired, and the color palette was kind of dispiriting. There was just a little too much blue and grey for my taste.

And when I saw the movie, the character designs didn’t impress me much more. For one thing, their eyes were placed so close together that a number of the characters appeared to go cross-eyed at random moments. If that sounds endearing, it wasn’t.

But I loved the film. The animation was some of the most fluid and expressive I’ve ever seen in a movie. The characters’ body language and facial expressions were nuanced and complex, and when they moved, all of the performers had amazing comic timing.

The story was even better. It was imaginative and surprising, even when I knew the plot details in advance. Some of the big emotional moments were telegraphed way ahead of time, and I still found them incredibly moving. The little emotional moments were pretty moving, too.

I will admit that it took me most of the first 20 minutes before I warmed to the film, for a very simple reason: A few of the characters are extremely annoying. Chris Pratt’s character was supposed to be kind of unpleasant, initially, to set up his redemption arc (and there are people who find Chris Pratt annoying to begin with), but the character of the stepfather started out doltish and just stayed doltish.* However: The redemption arc really works, and by the end of the movie, I sort of loved Pratt’s character.

So if you’re avoiding the movie based on the trailer…well, don’t. I thought the trailer was meh, too. Maybe you have specific, concrete objections to seeing the film, but if you’re staying away just because of a hunch, think about a specific public figure who’s been making decisions based on hunches and remember how well those worked out.

*Important note: The mother in the film is more of a collection of stereotypes about mothers than an actual character, but she’s played by Julia Louis-Dreyfus, so she gets a pass.

Tonio Kruger
Tonio Kruger
reply to  Danielm80
Wed, Mar 18, 2020 5:18am

Thank you for the response, Danielm80.

Unfortunately, the movie theatres in Dallas are officially closed now due to you-know-what so the whole question of whether or not this movie is worth seeing is kinda academic right now.

Even if that were not so, certain issues in my personal life have made it more and more unlikely for me to see a movie of any kind in the theatre, much less a first-run flick. However, this could change… in which case all I have to then worry about are the changes in society brought about by the recent health crisis…

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  Tonio Kruger
Wed, Mar 18, 2020 9:25am

For a lot of people, movies are about to become more important than ever. They just might be movies on smaller screens. Personally, I’ve been watching the Lilo and Stitch DVD (the two-disc “Big Wave” edition), which has so many bonus features it’s practically a course in animation.

If we’re going to be living out every dystopian novel at once (did we really need the global pandemic and the white supremacist president at the same time?), then it’s fortunate that so many science-fiction devices have been invented just in time to help us survive in our little nesting pods.

Bluejay
Bluejay
Sat, Mar 14, 2020 2:52pm

Hey, no one has mentioned the film’s biggest selling point: it’s got a song by Brandi Carlile.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ow3m_aZngvU

Guess I’ll have to see this at some point. :-)

Dr. Rocketscience
Dr. Rocketscience
Sat, Apr 04, 2020 3:08pm

Just watched on Disney+. It’s certainly a lesser Pixar work, but still charming. I put it on par with the Monsters movies and Brave. In fact, my kids put Dan Scanlon’s Monsters U on right after, and it shares a lot with that film.

Toongrrl
Sun, Jun 07, 2020 7:19am

I really loved what they did with mothers and middle aged women in this film, just a big deviation from how Disney portrayed these groups. Thank you.