
It Follows movie review: sexually transmitted dread
Wait. Really? Horror movies are still doing the punishing-girls-for-having-sex thing? Ah, but this is 80s retro, so it’s “okay,” then.

Wait. Really? Horror movies are still doing the punishing-girls-for-having-sex thing? Ah, but this is 80s retro, so it’s “okay,” then.

All of London is currently under construction…

Cartoons can be tricky to rate for gender representation… but it’s clear here that the only two female characters fill only limited supporting roles. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

There’s not much of a story, just a chance to spend more time with the gang of classy sexy randy oldsters. And that’s just fine.

Unpleasant, humor free, and contrary to accepted codes of movie morality. And that’s before it shows its hand as a pile of implausible sentimental mush.

I suspect they are saving the facade for future use.

The villain is a dude who fails to appreciate that sex is not all about what he alone wants. And the film gender-swaps a trope to motivate the protagonist. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

Reaches beyond ordinary laughable movie nonsense to create a moment — only one, alas — that will reign in the annals of cheesy cinematic history.

There is an ironic cat in this window, I swear…

It’s rare that a film makes it this explicit that women are little more than supporting characters in a man’s story. [This post is not behind the paywall.]