If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
2 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
John Mar
John Mar
Mon, Sep 07, 2009 8:36pm

Nice clip. Reminds me that the US used to be the fore-front of organised labour.

Is it a coincidence that Labour getting tarred as criminal and corrupt occurs as American manufacturing fails?

Tonio Kruger
Mon, Sep 07, 2009 10:54pm

Is it a coincidence that Labour getting tarred as criminal and corrupt occurs as American manufacturing fails?

What makes you think that started happening when American manufacturing fails?

On the Waterfront doesn’t paint a rosy picture of American organized labor and that was made during the height of the American manufacturing era.

Nor is all union corruption in America a figment of Michael Medved’s imagination–though it would be nice if it were.

And yet it’s hard to read American history and not come to the conclusion that unions are a necessary evil whose necessity has not yet passed. As bad as union corruption has been in the US, management corruption has been worst. And unfortunately, it seems to be a lot harder to punish a corrupt management team than to punish a corrupt union.