If it holds true to the current London real estate market, this will end up a structure that only Russian gangsters and Saudi oil sheiks can afford.
share and enjoy
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
I agree to the creation of an account at FlickFilosopher.com.
When you log in for the first time via a social-media account, this site collects your email address to automatically create an account for you here. Once your account is created, you’ll be logged in to this account.
disagreeagree
connect with
I agree to the creation of an account at FlickFilosopher.com.
When you log in for the first time via a social-media account, this site collects your email address to automatically create an account for you here. Once your account is created, you’ll be logged in to this account.
disagreeagree
please login to comment
2 Comments
oldest
newestmost voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Steve Gagen
Tue, Mar 10, 2015 11:39pm
That’s a dumb question MaryAnn – and we should be asking dumb questions like this more often! The only benefit you and I will get out of this “saving” is that that part of Soho will continue to look much like it did before they gutted the building to built apartments we can’t afford to live in! It reminds me of how somebody won an award here in Australia for designing a rehabilitation scheme for a local creek that had been destroyed by a freeway project. To my mind, the creek looked pretty good before they tore it to pieces to build the freeway!
RogerBW
Tue, Mar 17, 2015 12:53pm
But it means more money for someone who’s already rich! That’s got to be a good thing, right? All the big political parties support it.
please help keep truly independent film criticism alive!
Pledge your support now at Patreon or Substack.
FREE regular streaming recommendations via Substack and Patreon.
Or make a one-time or recurring donation via PayPal. (PayPal account not required; debit/credit card payment available.)
shop to support
When you purchase or rent almost anything from Amazon US, Amazon Canada, Amazon UK, and Apple TV, Books, and Music (globally), I get a small affiliate fee that helps support my work. Please use my links if you can! (Affiliate fees do not increase your cost.) Thank you!
That’s a dumb question MaryAnn – and we should be asking dumb questions like this more often! The only benefit you and I will get out of this “saving” is that that part of Soho will continue to look much like it did before they gutted the building to built apartments we can’t afford to live in! It reminds me of how somebody won an award here in Australia for designing a rehabilitation scheme for a local creek that had been destroyed by a freeway project. To my mind, the creek looked pretty good before they tore it to pieces to build the freeway!
But it means more money for someone who’s already rich! That’s got to be a good thing, right? All the big political parties support it.