London photo: but what are they saving it for?

savingbuilding

If it holds true to the current London real estate market, this will end up a structure that only Russian gangsters and Saudi oil sheiks can afford.

share and enjoy
               
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
2 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Steve Gagen
Steve Gagen
Tue, Mar 10, 2015 11:39pm

That’s a dumb question MaryAnn – and we should be asking dumb questions like this more often! The only benefit you and I will get out of this “saving” is that that part of Soho will continue to look much like it did before they gutted the building to built apartments we can’t afford to live in! It reminds me of how somebody won an award here in Australia for designing a rehabilitation scheme for a local creek that had been destroyed by a freeway project. To my mind, the creek looked pretty good before they tore it to pieces to build the freeway!

RogerBW
RogerBW
Tue, Mar 17, 2015 12:53pm

But it means more money for someone who’s already rich! That’s got to be a good thing, right? All the big political parties support it.