London photo of the day: I always thought Harry Potter was a little square…
Portrait of Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter created entirely out of Lego bricks.
Portrait of Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter created entirely out of Lego bricks.
I consider it a tremendous mark in favor of The Woman in Black that not once during its running time did I think, Hey, wait, wouldn’t Harry Potter have a spell to deal with this?
What my followers on Facebook, Twitter, and Google+ saw today…
Is this fair to fans? Does this benefit fans? Or is it just a way to force any fencesitters to spend who might not otherwise bother to buy the DVDs right now?
Since the question from prompted by a stage performance, feel free to include theater if you want. TV, too… though I suspect that as a longer form of storytelling, TV can’t ever cut it on actors alone.
Ha ha Harry Potter, where’s your magic now, eh?
I just love how happy Daniel Radcliffe looks…
This is simply a great flick: powerfully emotional, profoundly resonant, scary and funny and intense and wholly enrapturing.
Plus: Johnny Depp can’t see his own 3D POTC movie; Woody Allen sorta down on his own movies; why did Mel Gibson’s The Beaver flop?
Something has been bugging me since I saw Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 last autumn, and now that the film is out on DVD, it’s time to exorcise it…