Doctor Who thing of the day: this is how juicy a drama about the creation of the show could be
A peek at just how much drama was going on at the BBC in 1963…
A peek at just how much drama was going on at the BBC in 1963…
Is Mark Gatiss writing a drama about the creation of Doctor Who in 1963? His nondenial denials are certainly intriguing…
Technically, this doesn’t fit my definition of a Doctor Who Thing. But it does sorta get some bonus points for playing with a timey-whimey vibe, even though it doesn’t know it. (Or does it?)
There are a lot of ways in which this was 90 brilliant minutes of television drama, but the first way in which it’s brilliant is the opening moments…
There’s little resemblance to Arthur Conan Doyle’s story here, apart from the lashings of creepy atmosphere…
My god, Sherlock Holmes is an unbelievable bastard, isn’t he? Yet I love him…
The second series of Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss’s brilliant, brilliant Sherlock is about to start tomorrow, and so my hand is forced: I must finally write about the first series…
Can a thing be overly complicated and too simplistic at the same time? All that to-ing and fro-ing. All that buttoning and unbuttoning.
I’m not at the edge of raging with frustration like I was last week, but I am deeply mystified. Where is the Doctor Who that I love?
Benedict Cumberbatch is the sexiest high-functioning sociopath ever, and Martin Freeman is a Watson to be reckoned with. Instead of telegrams and monographs it’s all texts and blogs, but the best way to get around this 21st-century Holmes’ London is still by cab.