question of the day: What movie(s) do you absolutely have to see more than once to really get?
I’m gonna go with Memento… and now I wanna watch it for a fourth or fifth time and find something new again in it…
I’m gonna go with Memento… and now I wanna watch it for a fourth or fifth time and find something new again in it…
Just as we’ve all films we wish we’d never seen, so there are films we wish we would could come to fresh and unaware so that we could feel that first sense of discovery again…
We’ve all had movie moments we wish we could unsee, things so disturbing or upsetting that they are, alas, seared into our brains forever…
It’s cases like this that make me question the conventional wisdom that Hollywood only gives audiences what they want. It appears that the public does not want to see Lindsay Lohan onscreen. Something else must be going on.
Does your take on whether or not Mad Men is a thematic riff on our cultural reaction to 9/11 impact whether you see the use of such imagery as reasonable?
If not, why not? If you’re one of the few who doesn’t have any kind of cell phone at all, why not?
Obviously I’m not talking about an image that is actually motionless necessarily, but an image that implies stillness, one that the director lingers on, perhaps to create a sense of the sinister or the suspenseful…
Reel Steel (which I keep typing when I mean Real Steel) could be a gritty film noir about a private dectective who investigates Hollywood crimes…
Do they add an important perspective on a story that could not be obtained in another way? Do they have true journalistic value? Or at they nothing more than lurid sensationalism?
In recent years, nothing has blown me away the way that Watchmen’s opening sequence does: it brilliantly sets up the alternate reality the story takes place within…