If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
j4yx0r
j4yx0r
Thu, Jul 02, 2009 5:54pm

See, this is why I’m not an early adopter.

~j

0
Mimi
Mimi
Thu, Jul 02, 2009 11:11pm

My grandparents had an adding machine. It weighed about a thousand pounds and was about the size of a basketball. You would type in the operation you wanted to do (like, 33×123=) and hit whatever the enter/return equivalent was. And it would spit out the answer on this little ticker tape. That thing was AWESOME. And it helps me see why the pocket-size Sharp was a big deal.

Interesting there are no women’s voice in the “Boy! Math is hard!” audio montage at the beginning. Were we ladies not doing math in the ’70s?

0
j4yx0r
j4yx0r
Fri, Jul 03, 2009 12:17am

Were we ladies not doing math in the ’70s?

You mean you’re doing math now?! That’s progress, I guess. Good for you guys! Er… girls.

~j

0
Jennie
Jennie
Fri, Jul 03, 2009 2:25am

Interesting there are no women’s voice in the “Boy! Math is hard!” audio montage at the beginning. Were we ladies not doing math in the ’70s?

We were doing math in the ’70s… maybe we just didn’t find it hard like those men do.

0
Victor Plenty
Victor Plenty
Fri, Jul 03, 2009 9:23am

Of course women were doing math, and well before the 1970s, but back then, men were more frequently in a corporate management role that let them take the credit for it.

As a result of this, men were also more frequently given the authority to make financial decisions on the scale of spending $345, which, in 1971 (the year this calculator was first introduced), had the approximate purchasing power of over $1,800 in 2009 money.

(Source for constant dollar calculation: http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl)

0
Gee
Gee
Fri, Jul 03, 2009 10:35am

My first calculator was a Sharp but I must’ve got it a few years later because it certainly cost a lot less than this! It was great – Polish notation and you could write words if you turned the display upside down. Shelloil! (Admittedly, not very useful words, but little things were entertaining back then.)

My next calculator was a Casio which was sooo cool because it had an LCD display, non-Polish entry, with scientific and statistics functions. I was unreasonably fond of that machine.

0
wpdiscuz   wpDiscuz